There is increasing recognition that systematic post–cardiac arrest care after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) can improve the likelihood of patient survival with good quality of life. This is based in part on the publication of results of randomized controlled clinical trials as well as a description of the post–cardiac arrest syndrome. 1–3 Post–cardiac arrest care has significant potential to reduce early mortality caused by hemodynamic instability and later morbidity and mortality from multiorgan failure and brain injury. 3,4 This section summarizes our evolving understanding of the hemodynamic, neurological, and metabolic abnormalities encountered in patients who are initially resuscitated from cardiac arrest. The initial objectives of post–cardiac arrest care are to ● Optimize cardiopulmonary function and vital organ perfusion. ● After out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, transport patient to an appropriate hospital with a comprehensive post–cardiac arrest treatment system of care that includes acute coronary interventions, neurological care, goal-directed critical care, and hypothermia. ● Transport the in-hospital post–cardiac arrest patient to an appropriate critical-care unit capable of providing comprehensive post–cardiac arrest care. ● Try to identify and treat the precipitating causes of the arrest and prevent recurrent arrest.

http://www.kardio.hu/feltoltott/dokumentumok/fajl_201148104747Cardiopulm_resuscit_Pt9_Post_cardiac.pdf

Part 9: Post-Cardiac Arrest Care: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care

https://genoplivning.dk/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/european-resuscitation-council-guidelines-for-resuscitation-2010-section-4-adult-advanced-life-support.pdf

European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 4 Adult advanced life support

European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation.

BACKGROUND: The aim of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) is to replace nicotine from cigarettes. This reduces withdrawal symptoms associated with smoking cessation thus helping resist the urge to smoke cigarettes. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this review were to determine the effectiveness of the different forms of nicotine replacement therapy (chewing gum, transdermal patches, nasal spray, inhalers and tablets) in achieving abstinence from cigarettes, or a sustained reduction in amount smoked; to determine whether the effect is influenced by the clinical setting in which the smoker is recruited and treated, the dosage and form of the NRT used, or the intensity of additional advice and support offered to the smoker; to determine whether combinations of NRT are more effective than one type alone; and to determine its effectiveness compared to other pharmacotherapies. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group trials register in July 2002. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized trials in which NRT was compared to placebo or no treatment, or where different doses of NRT were compared. We excluded trials which did not report cessation rates, and those with follow-up of less than six months. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We extracted data in duplicate on the type of subjects, the dose and duration and form of nicotine therapy, the outcome measures, method of randomization, and completeness of follow-up. The main outcome measure was abstinence from smoking after at least six months of follow-up. We used the most rigorous definition of abstinence for each trial, and biochemically validated rates if available. Where appropriate, we performed meta-analysis using a fixed effects model (Peto). MAIN RESULTS: We identified 110 trials; 96 with a non NRT control group. The odds ratio for abstinence with NRT compared to control was 1.74 (95% confidence interval 1.64 - 1.86), The odds ratios for the different forms of NRT were 1.66 for gum, 1.74 for patches, 2.27 for nasal spray, 2.08 for inhaled nicotine and 2.08 for nicotine sublingual tablet/lozenge. These odds were largely independent of the duration of therapy, the intensity of additional support provided or the setting in which the NRT was offered. In highly dependent smokers there was a significant benefit of 4 mg gum compared with 2mg gum (odds ratio 2.67, 95% confidence interval 1.69 - 4.22). There was weak evidence that combinations of forms of NRT are more effective. Higher doses of nicotine patch may produce small increases in quit rates. Only one study directly compared NRT to another pharmacotherapy, in which bupropion was significantly more effective than nicotine patch or placebo. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: All of the commercially available forms of NRT (nicotine gum, transdermal patch, the nicotine nasal spray, nicotine inhaler and nicotine sublingual tablets/lozenges) are effective as part of a strategy to promote smoking cessation. They increase quit rates approximately 1.5 to 2 fold regardless of setting. The effectiveness of NRT appears to be largely independent of the intensity of additional support provided to the smoker. Provision of more intense levels of support, although beneficial in facilitating the likelihood of quitting, is not essential to the success of NRT. There is promising evidence that bupropion may be more effective than NRT (either alone or in combination). However, its most appropriate place in the therapeutic armamentarium requires further study and consideration.

Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation.

In total, 939 patients were included in the primary analysis. At the end of the trial, 50% of the patients in the 33°C group (235 of 473 patients) had died, as compared with 48% of the patients in the 36°C group (225 of 466 patients) (hazard ratio with a temperature of 33°C, 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89 to 1.28; P = 0.51). At the 180-day follow-up, 54% of the patients in the 33°C group had died or had poor neurologic function according to the CPC, as compared with 52% of patients in the 36°C group (risk ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.16; P = 0.78). In the analysis using the modified Rankin scale, the comparable rate was 52% in both groups (risk ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.14; P = 0.87). The results of analyses adjusted for known prognostic factors were similar. Conclusions In unconscious survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac cause, hypothermia at a targeted temperature of 33°C did not confer a benefit as compared with a targeted temperature of 36°C. (Funded by the Swedish Heart–Lung Foundation and others; TTM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01020916.)

/pdf/targeted-temperature-management-at-33-c-versus-36-c-after-2fsmyeqnqt.pdf

Targeted Temperature Management at 33°C versus 36°C after Cardiac Arrest

Background: Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) after cardiac arrest protects from neurological sequels and death and is recommended in guidelines. The Hypothermia Registry was founded to the monitor outcome, performance and complications of TH. Methods: Data on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients admitted to intensive care for TH were registered. Hospital survival and long-term outcome (6-12 months) were documented using the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) scale, CPC 1-2 representing a good outcome and 3-5 a bad outcome. Results: From October 2004 to October 2008, 986 TH-treated OHCA patients of all causes were included in the registry. Long-term outcome was reported in 975 patients. The median time from arrest to initiation of TH was 90 min (interquartile range, 60-165 min) and time to achieving the target temperature ( 90% having a good neurological function at long-term follow-up. Factors related to the timing of TH had no apparent association to outcome. The incidence of adverse events was acceptable but the risk of bleeding was increased if angiography/PCI was performed.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02021.x

Outcome, timing and adverse events in therapeutic hypothermia after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Women are less successful than men at quitting smoking. We examined whether the male vs. female cessation outcome was influenced by baseline smoking behavior in participants who attempted to quit by using nicotine inhaler (NI) plus nicotine patch (NP) combination therapy. This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial enrolled 196 men and 204 women. Group 1 (99 men, 101 women) received NI plus NP (15 mg nicotine/16 h) for 6 weeks, then NI plus placebo patch (PP) for 6 weeks, then NI alone for 14 weeks. Group 2 (97 men, 103 women) received NI plus PP for 12 weeks, then NI alone for 14 weeks. Outcome measures were continuous self-reported abstinence and expired carbon monoxide concentration < 10 ppm. Baseline nicotine dependence was assessed by the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND), and behavioral dependence by the 18-question Glover-Nilsson Smoking Behavioral Questionnaire (GN-SBQ). Male vs. female complete abstinence rates, regardless of treatment group, were 61.7% vs. 46.6% at 6 weeks (p = .0022), 42.3% vs. 30.9% at 12 weeks (p = .017), 30.1% vs. 17.6% at 6 months (p = .003), and 23.0% vs. 10.8% at 12 months, respectively (p = .001). Men had significantly higher baseline FTND (p = .0180) and lower total GN-SBQ (p < .0001) scores than women. In conclusion, women appear to have higher behavioral, and lower nicotine, dependence than men according to the GN-SBQ and the FTND; thus both nicotine and behavioral treatment should be tailored to women to increase their chances of abstinence.

Gender differences in quit rates following smoking cessation with combination nicotine therapy: influence of baseline smoking behavior.

A non-combustible nicotine inhaler, administered orally, has been developed for treatment of smokers. The inhaler allows weaning from nicotine while maintaining partial reinforcement of the ritual/sensory phenomena of smoking. Subjects were randomly assigned to active (n = 112) and placebo (n = 111) groups. Some behavioral intervention occurred as a function of participation. Strict abstinence (primary outcome criterion) was defined by CO < or = 8 ppm with no slips allowed at any time and cotinine values < or = 14 at 1 year. Survival analysis showed active inhaler was superior to placebo (p < 0.01). Active vs. placebo success rates were: 63% vs. 47% (day 3), 46% vs. 28% (week 1), 36% vs. 19% (week 2), 33% vs. 16% (week 3), 29% vs. 14% (week 6), 24% vs. 10% (3 months), 17% vs. 9% (6 months) and 13% vs. 8% (1 year). chi 2 analyses were significant through 3 months but not at 6 months (p < 0.08) or 1 year. Craving was relieved with active inhalers at day 3 and week 1. Subjects averaged six inhalers/day. Cotinine levels were 57-61% of smoking levels. Common side effects included throat/mouth irritation and coughing. Failure was predicted by early slips. The inhaler is clearly useful for short-term smoking cessation with potential for long-term efficacy. Extended access to the inhaler and relapse prevention training could improve success rates. Another promising approach would be to combine the inhaler with a nicotine patch.

Efficacy of a nicotine inhaler in smoking cessation: a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial

Aims. Evaluation of the clinical efficacy and safety of a nicotine 2-mg sublingual tablet in smoking cessation. Design. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of smokers using the 2-mg tablet for 3-6 months with follow-up to 12 months. Dosing was established according to baseline nicotine dependence, scored on the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire (FTQ): FTQ ≥ 7, two tablets/hour (maximum 40/day); FTQ < 7, one tablet/hour (maximum 20/day). Setting. Smoking cessation programme in a department of oral and maxillofacial surgery. Participants. A total of 247 adult smokers, smoking ≥ 10 cigarettes/day for ≥ 3 years, of whom 123 received active and 124 placebo treatment. The study was powered to detect difference at 6 months. Measurements. Efficacy and safety were evaluated at 6 weeks and 3, 6 and 12 months. Self-reported abstinence was verified by exhaled CO < 10 p.p.m. Findings. Success rates for complete abstinence (no slips after 2 weeks) for active vs. placebo were 50% vs. 29% at 6 weeks, 42% vs. 23% at 3 months, 33% vs. 18% at 6 months and 23% vs. 15% at 12 months ( p < 0.001, 0.001, 0.005 and p = 0.14), respectively. Craving during the first 8 days was significantly reduced among highly dependent smokers on active treatment compared to placebo. Baseline mucosal lesions among abstinent subjects were reduced during the treatment period and at the non-treatment follow-up. Adverse events were mild and tolerable, the most common being irritation and soreness in the mouth and throat. Conclusion. The nicotine sublingual tablet increased the smoking cessation rate compared to placebo, reduced craving in highly dependent smokers and was well tolerated.

A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled clinical evaluation of a nicotine sublingual tablet in smoking cessation

This study assessed the efficacy and safety of a nicotine sublingual tablet in smoking cessation in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled outpatient trial conducted between January 1996 and May 1997. Two hundred and forty-one adult smokers (> or = 10 cigarettes/day for at least 3 years) used nicotine 2-mg sublingual tablet (n = 120) or placebo (n = 121) for up to 6 months (a 3-month treatment period followed by a 3-month tapering period). Subjects who scored <7 on the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire used 1 tablet/h (up to maximum of 20/day), whereas subjects who scored (7 used 2 tablets/h (up to maximum of 40/day). Brief counseling was provided at baseline and at all visits. Self-reported abstinence was measured from week 2 onwards, confirmed by expired carbon monoxide (CO) levels <10 ppm at each visit (1, 2, 3 and 6 weeks and 3, 6 and 12 months). After 6 weeks of treatment, CO-validated abstinence rates were 48% in the active group and 23% in the placebo group (p < 0.0001). At the 3-, 6- and 12-month visits, abstinence rates (active vs. placebo) were 33% vs. 17% (p = 0.0046), 21% vs. 11% (p = 0.0304) and 18% vs. 10% (p = 0.0606). Adverse events were mild and transient and reflected those reported with existing nicotine replacement formulations. We concluded that the nicotine 2-mg sublingual tablet was effective as a smoking cessation aid.

F Nilsson

Papers

Outcome, timing and adverse events in therapeutic hypothermia after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Gender differences in quit rates following smoking cessation with combination nicotine therapy: influence of baseline smoking behavior.

Efficacy of a nicotine inhaler in smoking cessation: a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial

A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled clinical evaluation of a nicotine sublingual tablet in smoking cessation

A comparison of a nicotine sublingual tablet and placebo for smoking cessation.