scispace - formally typeset
F

Fabien Postel-Vinay

Researcher at University College London

Publications -  88
Citations -  5968

Fabien Postel-Vinay is an academic researcher from University College London. The author has contributed to research in topics: Wage & Unemployment. The author has an hindex of 34, co-authored 87 publications receiving 5442 citations. Previous affiliations of Fabien Postel-Vinay include Sciences Po & University of Paris.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Equilibrium Wage Dispersion with Worker and Employer Heterogeneity

TL;DR: In this article, an equilibrium search model with on-the-job-search is presented, where firms make take-it-or-leave-it wage offers to workers conditional on their characteristics and they can respond to the outside job offers received by their employees.
Posted Content

Wage bargaining with on-the-job search: Theory and evidence

TL;DR: The authors found that between-firm competition matters a lot in the determination of wages, because it is quantitatively more important than wage bargaining a la Nash in raising wages above the workers' "reservation wages," defined as out-of-work income.
Posted Content

Temporary Jobs, Employment Protection and Labor Market Performance

TL;DR: In this article, the authors use a simple matching model with endogenous job destructions to analyze the impact of a combination of heavy employment protection taxes and the widespread use of fixed-duration contracts.
Journal ArticleDOI

Wage bargaining with on-the-job search: Theory and evidence

TL;DR: This article found that between-firm competition matters a lot in the determination of wages, because it is quantitatively more important than wage bargaining a la Nash in raising wages above the workers' "reservation wages," defined as out-of-work income.
Journal ArticleDOI

Temporary jobs, employment protection and labor market performance

TL;DR: In this article, the authors analyzed the combined impact of strong employment protection and temporary jobs using a matching model and found that it may be the willingness of a majority of workers to support the combination of two instruments with opposite effects on job destruction and job creation.