Fiona Fidler

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss how reform has progressed or not progressed in psychology, medicine, and ecology and describe case studies of attempts by pioneering journal editors to change statistical practices.

TL;DR: Better guidelines, or ‘rules of eye’, and improved graphical presentations are suggested to assist with confidence interval presentation and interpretation, to facilitate conceptual change in thinking not only about interval estimates themselves, but also the often misunderstood concept of statistical significance.

TL;DR: The REPRISE project takes a systematic approach to determine how reliable systematic reviews of interventions are and aims to explore various aspects relating to the transparency, reproducibility and replicability of several components of systematic reviews with meta-analysis of the effects of health, social, behavioural and educational interventions.

TL;DR: The authors provide a brief outline of the four main models for establishing epistemic justification in science and explain the essential role that establishing null results plays in each of them, and argue that scientists could do worse than follow Popper's advice about bold conjectures and risky tests in establishing the absence (or presence) of effects.

TL;DR: Recommendations reinforce the need to report standard deviations, but do not justify noninterpretation of CIs, and support research to develop and evaluate better guidelines for use and interpretation of CI.