scispace - formally typeset
F

Francisco J. Ayala

Researcher at University of California, Irvine

Publications -  540
Citations -  29251

Francisco J. Ayala is an academic researcher from University of California, Irvine. The author has contributed to research in topics: Population & Gene. The author has an hindex of 87, co-authored 537 publications receiving 28103 citations. Previous affiliations of Francisco J. Ayala include University of Valencia & University of California.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Tempo and mode in evolution.

TL;DR: In the introduction to his book, Simpson averred that an essential part of his study was an "attempted synthesis of paleontology and genetics," an effort that pervaded the whole book, but was particularly the subject of the first two chapters, which accounted for nearly half the book's pages.
Journal ArticleDOI

Enzyme variability in the drosophila willistoni group. iv. genic variation in natural populations of drosophila willistoni

TL;DR: The observations support the conclusion that balancing natural selection is the major factor responsible for the considerable genetic variation observed in D. willistoni.
Journal ArticleDOI

A clonal theory of parasitic protozoa: the population structures of Entamoeba, Giardia, Leishmania, Naegleria, Plasmodium, Trichomonas, and Trypanosoma and their medical and taxonomical consequences

TL;DR: A population genetic analysis of extensive data on biochemical polymorphisms indicates that the two fundamental consequences of sexual reproduction are apparently rare or absent in natural populations of the parasitic protozoa.
Journal ArticleDOI

Global Models of Growth and Competition

TL;DR: This model represents an extension of the Lotka-Volterra model of competition; it adds a fourth parameter that controls the degree of nonlinearity in intraspecific growth regulation and represents a similar Extension of the logistic model of population growth.
Journal ArticleDOI

Pseudogenes: are they "junk" or functional DNA?

TL;DR: The Drosophila literature is reviewed and the proposal that pseudogenes be considered as potogenes, i.e., DNA sequences with a potentiality for becoming new genes is agreed.