scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Frans van den Bosch published in 2015"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide a theoretical framework to explain leaders' regulatory focus and exploration-exploitation activities from a psychological viewpoint, and employ two moderator variables to better understand the different properties and boundaries of this framework.
Abstract: In recent years, there has been strong interest in leaders' exploration and exploitation activities, especially because of their positive effects on performance. Most prior research in this area has focused on the organizational antecedents of leaders' exploration and exploitation activities, with less consideration given to the psychological precursors. This paper draws upon insights from the behavioral strategy literature to inform our theoretical perspective on leaders' exploration–exploitation activities. In particular, by conceptually linking leaders' regulatory focus and exploration–exploitation, we provide a theoretical framework to explain these activities from a psychological viewpoint. Moreover, we employ two moderator variables to better understand the different properties and boundaries of this framework. All in all, this paper has a number of implications for strategic leadership theory and practice.

65 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine relocations of core parts of corporate headquarters (CHQ) to alternative host countries and identify and investigate relocation drivers and associated strategic benefits related to two main categories of drivers: (1) an increase in the degree to which the MNC is internationalised; and (2) a decrease in the perceived attractiveness of the home country to the mNC.

51 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a case study of the Port of Rotterdam to empirically capture how the port has done so in the last decade by strategically making use of two generic types of policy instruments: (i) investments in physical and knowledge infrastructure and (ii) land allocation.
Abstract: Major ports such as Rotterdam, Antwerp, Houston and Singapore’s Jurong Port host large industrial complexes of (petro)chemical and other energy-intensive process industry firms. Port authorities face the challenge to contribute to both greater international competitiveness and better environmental performance of these complexes. The development of industrial ecosystems, in which firms located in port areas use one another’s residual energy and chemical effluents as input for their own production process, appears to be a promising strategic response to this challenge. In this article, we contribute to port research by examining how port authorities can foster this development within their port-industrial complex. We present a case study of the Port of Rotterdam to empirically capture how the Port of Rotterdam Authority has done so in the last decade by strategically making use of two generic types of policy instruments: (i) investments in physical and knowledge infrastructure and (ii) land allocation. On the basis of the case study and previous literature, we derive a set of strategic levers of port authorities to foster industrial ecosystem development. We discuss implications and challenges for port authorities.

36 citations



Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the adoption of a shareholder value orientation (SVO) has been studied from a socio-political perspective, and the authors find a negative relationship between SVO adoption and subsequent firm performance.
Abstract: Manuscript Type Empirical Research Question/Issue In recent years, research aimed at identifying and relating the antecedents and consequences of diffusing organizational practices/ideas has turned its attention to debating the international adoption and implementation of the Anglo-American model of corporate governance, i.e., a shareholder value orientation (SVO). While financial economists characterize the adoption of an SVO as necessary and performance-enhancing, behavioral scientists have disputed such claims, invoking institutional contingencies in the appropriateness of an SVO. Our study seeks to provide some resolution to the debate by developing an overarching sociopolitical perspective that links the antecedents and consequences of the adoption of the contested practice of SVO. Research Findings/Insights We test our framework using extensive longitudinal data from 1992–2006 from the largest listed corporations in the Netherlands. We find a negative relationship between SVO adoption and subsequent firm performance, although this effect is attenuated when accompanied by greater SVO alignment among major owners and a firm's visible commitment to an SVO. Theoretical/Academic Implications This study extends prior research on the diffusion of contested organizational practices that has taken a sociopolitical perspective by offering an original contingency perspective that addresses how and why the misaligned preferences of corporate owners will affect (i) a company's inclination to espouse an SVO, and (ii) the performance consequences of such misalignment. Practitioner/Policy Implications This study suggests that, when board members are considering the adoption of new ideas/practices (e.g., SVO), they should consider the contextual fitness of the idea/practice with the firm's owners and their interests.

24 citations



Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jan 2015
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine how co-creation, conceptualized by relationship learning, influences exploitative and exploratory innovation and how these effects are contingent upon an important informal coordination mechanism: connectedness within a unit.
Abstract: Co-creation with customers is considered to be an important source of competitive advantage. However, prior research has provided mixed results to what extent it increases innovation performance and mainly included the role of formal coordination mechanisms within an organization in it. To contribute to address these gaps in the co-creation literature, we examine how co-creation, conceptualized by relationship learning, influences exploitative and exploratory innovation and how these effects are contingent upon an important informal coordination mechanism: connectedness within a unit. Based on a survey among Dutch care organizations, our findings indicate that relationship learning with customers has an inverted U-shaped effect on exploitative innovation, while its effect on exploratory innovation is positive. Additionally, connectedness flattens the negative effect of higher levels of relationship learning with customers on exploitative innovation, while it has a negative effect on exploratory innovation...

2 citations