[서평]「The Unified Modeling Language User Guide」

Constraint programming is a powerful paradigm for solving combinatorial search problems that draws on a wide range of techniques from artificial intelligence, computer science, databases, programming languages, and operations research. Constraint programming is currently applied with success to many domains, such as scheduling, planning, vehicle routing, configuration, networks, and bioinformatics.

The aim of this handbook is to capture the full breadth and depth of the constraint programming field and to be encyclopedic in its scope and coverage. While there are several excellent books on constraint programming, such books necessarily focus on the main notions and techniques and cannot cover also extensions, applications, and languages. The handbook gives a reasonably complete coverage of all these lines of work, based on constraint programming, so that a reader can have a rather precise idea of the whole field and its potential. Of course each line of work is dealt with in a survey-like style, where some details may be neglected in favor of coverage. However, the extensive bibliography of each chapter will help the interested readers to find suitable sources for the missing details. Each chapter of the handbook is intended to be a self-contained survey of a topic, and is written by one or more authors who are leading researchers in the area.

The intended audience of the handbook is researchers, graduate students, higher-year undergraduates and practitioners who wish to learn about the state-of-the-art in constraint programming. No prior knowledge about the field is necessary to be able to read the chapters and gather useful knowledge. Researchers from other fields should find in this handbook an effective way to learn about constraint programming and to possibly use some of the constraint programming concepts and techniques in their work, thus providing a means for a fruitful cross-fertilization among different research areas.

The handbook is organized in two parts. The first part covers the basic foundations of constraint programming, including the history, the notion of constraint propagation, basic search methods, global constraints, tractability and computational complexity, and important issues in modeling a problem as a constraint problem. The second part covers constraint languages and solver, several useful extensions to the basic framework (such as interval constraints, structured domains, and distributed CSPs), and successful application areas for constraint programming.

- Covers the whole field of constraint programming
- Survey-style chapters
- Five chapters on applications

Table of Contents

Foreword (Ugo Montanari) 
Part I : Foundations
Chapter 1. Introduction (Francesca Rossi, Peter van Beek, Toby Walsh) 
Chapter 2. Constraint Satisfaction: An Emerging Paradigm (Eugene C. Freuder, Alan K. Mackworth) 
Chapter 3. Constraint Propagation (Christian Bessiere) 
Chapter 4. Backtracking Search Algorithms (Peter van Beek) 
Chapter 5. Local Search Methods (Holger H. Hoos, Edward Tsang) 
Chapter 6. Global Constraints (Willem-Jan van Hoeve, Irit Katriel)
Chapter 7. Tractable Structures for CSPs (Rina Dechter)
Chapter 8. The Complexity of Constraint Languages
(David Cohen, Peter Jeavons) 
Chapter 9. Soft Constraints (Pedro Meseguer, Francesca Rossi, Thomas Schiex) 
Chapter 10. Symmetry in Constraint Programming
(Ian P. Gent, Karen E. Petrie, Jean-Francois Puget)
Chapter 11. Modelling (Barbara M. Smith) 
Part II : Extensions, Languages, and Applications

Chapter 12. Constraint Logic Programming (Kim Marriott, Peter J. Stuckey, Mark Wallace) 
Chapter 13. Constraints in Procedural and Concurrent Languages (Thom Fruehwirth, Laurent Michel, Christian Schulte)
Chapter 14. Finite Domain Constraint Programming Systems (Christian Schulte, Mats Carlsson) 
Chapter 15. Operations Research Methods in Constraint Programming (John Hooker) 
Chapter 16. Continuous and Interval Constraints(Frederic Benhamou, Laurent Granvilliers) 
Chapter 17. Constraints over Structured Domains
(Carmen Gervet) 
Chapter 18. Randomness and Structure (Carla Gomes, Toby Walsh)
Chapter 19. Temporal CSPs (Manolis Koubarakis)
Chapter 20. Distributed Constraint Programming
(Boi Faltings) 
Chapter 21. Uncertainty and Change (Kenneth N. Brown, Ian Miguel)
Chapter 22. Constraint-Based Scheduling and Planning
(Philippe Baptiste, Philippe Laborie, Claude Le Pape, Wim Nuijten)
Chapter 23. Vehicle Routing (Philip Kilby, Paul Shaw) 
Chapter 24. Configuration (Ulrich Junker)
Chapter 25. Constraint Applications in Networks
(Helmut Simonis)
Chapter 26. Bioinformatics and Constraints (Rolf Backofen, David Gilbert)

/pdf/handbook-of-constraint-programming-53srutguo2.pdf

Handbook of Constraint Programming

In this paper, we present a dynamic and adaptive variable ordering heuristic which guides systematic search toward inconsistent or hard parts of a Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP). This generic heuristic is able to exploit information about previous states of the search process whereas traditional dynamic ones only exploit information about the current state. Intuitively, it avoids some trashing by first instantiating variables involved in the constraints that have frequently participated in dead-end situations. Such information is recorded by associating a weight with each constraint. This weight is increased whenever the associated constraint is violated during search. The extensive experiments that we have conducted prove that our conflict-directed approach is the most efficient current one with respect to significant and large classes of academic, random and real-world instances.

Boosting systematic search by weighting constraints

Publisher Summary
This chapter discusses that constraint reasoning involves various types of techniques to tackle the inherent intractability of the problem of satisfying a set of constraints. Constraint propagation is one of those types of techniques. It is central to the process of solving a constraint problem and indispensable for constraint reasoning. The chapter examines that constraint propagation embeds any reasoning, which consists in explicitly forbidding values or combinations of values for some variables of a problem, because a given subset of its constraints cannot be satisfied otherwise. It is in constraint reasoning that this concept shows its most accomplished form. There is no other field in which the concept of constraint propagation appears in such a variety of forms, and in which its characteristics have been analyzed. The chapter reviews that it formalizes all constraint propagation approaches within a unifying framework and discusses the main existing types of constraint propagation.

/pdf/chapter-3-constraint-propagation-5d562xnkf1.pdf

Chapter 3 – Constraint Propagation

We present a learning-based approach to computing solutions for certain NP-hard problems. Our approach combines deep learning techniques with useful algorithmic elements from classic heuristics. The central component is a graph convolutional network that is trained to estimate the likelihood, for each vertex in a graph, of whether this vertex is part of the optimal solution. The network is designed and trained to synthesize a diverse set of solutions, which enables rapid exploration of the solution space via tree search. The presented approach is evaluated on four canonical NP-hard problems and five datasets, which include benchmark satisfiability problems and real social network graphs with up to a hundred thousand nodes. Experimental results demonstrate that the presented approach substantially outperforms recent deep learning work, and performs on par with highly optimized state-of-the-art heuristic solvers for some NP-hard problems. Experiments indicate that our approach generalizes across datasets, and scales to graphs that are orders of magnitude larger than those used during training.

/pdf/combinatorial-optimization-with-graph-convolutional-networks-37ryu3bl48.pdf

Combinatorial optimization with graph convolutional networks and guided tree search

Random constraint satisfaction: Easy generation of hard (satisfiable) instances

In an Arc Consistency (AC) algorithm, a residual support, or residue, is a support that has been stored during a previous execution of the procedure which determines if a value is supported by a constraint. The point is that a residue is not guaranteed to represent a lower bound of the smallest current support of a value. In this paper, we study the theoretical impact of exploiting residues with respect to the basic algorithm AC3. First, we prove that AC3rm (AC3 with multi-directional residues) is optimal for low and high constraint tightness. Second, we show that when AC has to be maintained during a backtracking search, MAC2001 presents, with respect to MAC3rm, an overhead in O(µed) per branch of the binary tree built by MAC, where µ denotes the number of refutations of the branch, e the number of constraints and d the greatest domain size of the constraint network. One consequence is that MAC3rm admits a better worst-case time complexity than MAC2001 for a branch involving µ refutations when either µ > d2 or µ > d and the tightness of any constraint is either low or high. Our experimental results clearly show that exploiting residues allows enhancing MAC and SAC algorithms.

/pdf/a-study-of-residual-supports-in-arc-consistency-44kefug9to.pdf

A study of residual supports in arc consistency

In this paper, we try to further demonstrate that the models of random CSP instances proposed by [Xu and Li, 2000; 2003] are of theoretical and practical interest. Indeed, these models, called RB and RD, present several nice features. First, it is quite easy to generate random instances of any arity since no particular structure has to be integrated, or property enforced, in such instances. Then, the existence of an asymptotic phase transition can be guaranteed while applying a limited restriction on domain size and on constraint tightness. In that case, a threshold point can be precisely located and all instances have the guarantee to be hard at the threshold, i.e., to have an exponential tree-resolution complexity. Next, a formal analysis shows that it is possible to generate forced satisfiable instances whose hardness is similar to unforced satisfiable ones. This analysis is supported by some representative results taken from an intensive experimentation that we have carried out, using complete and incomplete search methods.

/pdf/a-simple-model-to-generate-hard-satisfiable-instances-4sbnjcny5l.pdf

A simple model to generate hard satisfiable instances

We present a general algorithm which gives a uniform view of several state-of-the-art systematic backtracking search algorithms for solving both binary and nonbinary CSP instances. More precisely, this algorithm integrates the most usual or/and sophisticated look-back and look-ahead schemes. By means of this algorithm, our purpose is then to study the interest of backjump-based techniques with respect to conflict-directed variable ordering heuristics.

Fred Hemery

Papers

Boosting systematic search by weighting constraints

Random constraint satisfaction: Easy generation of hard (satisfiable) instances

A study of residual supports in arc consistency

A simple model to generate hard satisfiable instances

Backjump-based techniques versus conflict-directed heuristics