A basis for efficient representation of the S-transform

The subject of this review is the atmospheric chemistry of the metals which ablate from meteoroids in the Earth’s upper atmosphere. The major meteoric species are Fe, Mg, Si, and Na, against which two minor species, Ca and K, offer surprising contrasts. These metals exist as layers of atoms between about 80 and 105 km and atomic ions at higher altitudes. Below 85 km they form compounds—oxides, hydroxides, and carbonates—which polymerize into nanometer-sized meteoric smoke particles (MSPs). These particles probably act as condensation nuclei for clouds in the mesosphere and stratosphere and eventually after about 4 years are deposited at the Earth’s surface. The subject of meteoric metal chemistry was reviewed in 19911 and 2003,2 and there were also more focused reviews on laboratory studies of metal reactions in 19943 and 20024 and the atmospheric modeling of metals in 2002.5

The present review will therefore concentrate on the many developments that have taken place in the past decade. On the observational side, these developments include the near-global measurement of the Na, K, Mg, and Mg+ layers from satellite-borne spectrometers and lidar observations of Na and Fe from several Antarctic observatories, the discovery that metal atoms are removed in the vicinity of noctilucent (or polar mesospheric) clouds, the surprising observation of metal atoms up to around 180 km in the thermosphere, the unexpected finding that the ratio of the Na d lines in the terrestrial nightglow is variable, the first observations of the molecular bands of FeO and NiO in the nightglow, the first measurements of the vertical flux of Na atoms in the upper mesosphere, the measurement of MSPs from rockets, incoherent scatter radars, satellites, and aircraft, and measurements of the depositional flux of meteoric smoke in polar ice cores.

Laboratory measurements (including the application of quantum chemistry calculations) have addressed several issues: the ion and neutral gas-phase chemistries of compounds containing Fe, Ca, Mg, Si, and K, leading to the first chemically closed reaction schemes for these metals, the uptake of metal atoms on low-temperature ice surfaces and the resulting photoelectric emission, understanding the variable Na d line ratio observations, and the formation of a variety of iron oxide and Fe–Mg–silicate nanoparticles as analogues of meteoric smoke.

There have also been significant developments in modeling: a chemical ablation model to predict the evaporation rates of individual elements from a meteoroid, coupling this ablation model with an astronomical model of dust input to generate the meteoric input function (MIF), the inclusion of the MIF together with metal chemistry in a whole atmosphere chemistry climate model to create the first global models of the Na, Fe, Mg, and K layers, an explanation for the 50 year old puzzle of why the Na and K layers exhibit such different seasonal behavior, modeling the growth and transport of MSPs through the mesosphere and stratosphere, the paleoclimate implications of an enhanced cosmic dust input, and the climate implications of the deposition of meteoric Fe into the Southern Ocean.

The present review is divided into five sections following this Introduction. Section 2 is a general review of the mesosphere and lower thermosphere from the perspective of understanding the metal layers and the sensitivity of this atmospheric region to solar activity and longer term anthropogenic changes. Section 3 describes the atmospheric chemistry of the meteoric metals and then reviews observations of the metal layers and MSPs. Section 4 deals with laboratory and theoretical studies of gas-phase metal reactions and particle formation under mesospheric conditions. Section 5 is concerned with the development of global models of metal chemistry which describe the input and ablation of cosmic dust, the gas-phase chemistry of metallic species, the formation of MSPs, and transport to the Earth’s surface. Section 6 is then a summary with a discussion of future directions for the field.

The mesosphere and metals: chemistry and changes.

Internal wave coupling processes in Earth's atmosphere

[1] An unusually long data set was acquired at the sodium lidar facility at Colorado State University (41N, 105W), between Sep 18 and Oct 01, 2003, including a 9-day continuous observation. This time is long enough to average out the perturbations of gravity waves and short-period planetary waves. As such, it can be used to define tidal-period perturbations in temperature and horizontal wind. Assuming the sodium mixing ratio is a constant of motion, the observed tidal-period oscillation in sodium density follows that of vertical wind. Thus, the data set defines tidal-period perturbations of temperature and wind vector. The observed amplitudes and phases were compared to Global Scale Wave Model predictions (both GSWM00 and GSWM02). We found excellent agreement in diurnal phases and reasonable agreement in semidiurnal phases. However, GSWM02 overestimates diurnal amplitudes and both model versions underestimate observed semidiurnal amplitudes. Since the data period is long enough for the study of planetary waves and of tidal variability, we perform spectral analysis of the data, revealing a strong quasi 3-day wave in meridional wind, a 14 hour perturbation in zonal wind, and both 14-hour and 10-hour periods in meridional wind, likely the result of nonlinear interactions. The observed semidiurnal amplitudes are much larger than the corresponding diurnal amplitudes above 85 km, and over a few days the diurnal and semidiurnal amplitudes vary by factors of 2–3. Causes for the observed tidal variability in terms of planetary wave modulation and tide-gravity wave interaction are explored qualitatively.

/pdf/tidal-perturbations-and-variability-in-the-mesopause-region-36thw8cnif.pdf

Tidal perturbations and variability in the mesopause region over Fort Collins, CO (41N, 105W): Continuous multi-day temperature and wind lidar observations

The transition between the middle atmosphere and the thermosphere is known as the MLT region (for mesosphere and lower thermosphere). This area has some char- acteristics that set it apart from other regions of the atmosphere. Most notably, it is the altitude region with the lowest overall temperature and has the unique characteristic that the temperature is much lower in summer than in winter. The summer-to-winter-tem- perature gradient is the result of adiabatic cooling and warming associated with a vigorous circulation driven primarily by gravity waves. Tides and planetary waves also contribute to the circulation and to the large dynamical variability in the MLT. The past decade has seen much progress in describing and understanding the dynamics of the MLT and the inter- actions of dynamics with chemistry and radiation. This review describes recent observa- tions and numerical modeling as they relate to understanding the dynamical processes that control the MLT and its variability. Results from the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model (WACCM), which is a comprehensive high-top general circulation model with interactive chemistry, are used to illustrate the dynamical processes. Selected observations from the Sounding the Atmosphere with Broadband Emission Radiometry (SABER) instrument are shown for comparison. WACCM simulations of MLT dynamics have some differences with observations. These differences and other questions and dis- crepancies described in recent papers point to a number of ongoing uncertainties about the MLT dynamical system.

/pdf/global-dynamics-of-the-mlt-27clum6d5c.pdf

Global Dynamics of the MLT

Global-scale tidal variability during the PSMOS campaign of June–August 1999: interaction with planetary waves

Global-scale tidal structure in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere during the PSMOS campaign of June-August 1999 and comparisons with the global-scale wave model

G.I. Fraser

Papers

Global-scale tidal variability during the PSMOS campaign of June–August 1999: interaction with planetary waves

Global-scale tidal structure in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere during the PSMOS campaign of June-August 1999 and comparisons with the global-scale wave model