scispace - formally typeset
G

Gary S. Shaber

Researcher at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital

Publications -  11
Citations -  573

Gary S. Shaber is an academic researcher from Thomas Jefferson University Hospital. The author has contributed to research in topics: Breast cancer & Mammography. The author has an hindex of 9, co-authored 11 publications receiving 565 citations. Previous affiliations of Gary S. Shaber include Thomas Jefferson University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Multicentricity of non-palpable breast cancer

TL;DR: Findings suggested that any therapeutic procedure for either invasive or non‐invasive ductal carcinoma that does not include total mastectomy may leave behind foci of cancer, which are a threat to the patient.
Journal ArticleDOI

Dual-energy mammography: a detector analysis.

TL;DR: Dual-energy mammography acquisition scenarios employing single-shot techniques are examined using computer simulation and the figure of merit of the signal-to-noise ratio squared over the glandular dose was chosen for the optimization task due to its exposure independence.
Journal ArticleDOI

Thermography, mammography, and clinical examination in breast cancer screening. Review of 16,000 studies.

TL;DR: The greatest effectiveness of mammography vs. clinical examination was seen in detection of early breast cancers (small lesions with negative axillary lymph nodes), and thermography was less effective than it was in patients with larger lesions and lymph node metastases.
Journal ArticleDOI

Neural networks in radiology: An introduction and evaluation in a signal detection task

TL;DR: The neural network performed with better accuracy, relative to human observer performance, in the detection of this elementary test object, and the favorable performance of neural networks at this level suggests that further investigation is warranted.
Journal ArticleDOI

The pathology of breast cancer detected by mass population screening.

TL;DR: While the initial results of mass screening appear favorable, prolonged follow‐up is needed to determine its impact on the population at risk.