scispace - formally typeset
G

Geoffrey F. Grubb

Researcher at Ohio State University

Publications -  9
Citations -  425

Geoffrey F. Grubb is an academic researcher from Ohio State University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Exergy & Sustainability. The author has an hindex of 6, co-authored 9 publications receiving 400 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Exergy: Its Potential and Limitations in Environmental Science and Technology

TL;DR: It proves that exergy as a tool in environmental impact analysis may be the most mature field of application, particularly with respect to resource and efficiency accounting, one of the major challenges in the development of sustainable technology.
Journal ArticleDOI

Life Cycle of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticle Production

TL;DR: In this article, the life cycle impact of emissions, energy requirements, and exergetic losses are calculated for a novel process for producing titanium dioxide nanoparticles from an ilmenite feedstock.
Journal ArticleDOI

Appreciating the Role of Thermodynamics in LCA Improvement Analysis via an Application to Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles

TL;DR: Exergetic resource accounting at the life cycle scale shows that other materials are at least as significant as fossil fuels for the production of TiO2 nanoparticles in this process.
Journal ArticleDOI

Towards sustainability of engineered processes: Designing self-reliant networks of technological–ecological systems

TL;DR: The idea of designing networks of technological systems along with their supporting ecological systems that exploit the synergy between them and can help in closing material loops and minimize exergy loss, leading to truly self-sustaining systems is introduced.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Energetic and environmental evaluation of titanium dioxide nanoparticles

TL;DR: In this paper, the results of energy, exergy, and life cycle analysis for a new nano-manufacturing process producing 40 nm titanium dioxide particles were compared using identical boundaries for each analysis allowing for direct comparison of the results from each method.