scispace - formally typeset
G

Georg Osterhoff

Researcher at Leipzig University

Publications -  181
Citations -  3097

Georg Osterhoff is an academic researcher from Leipzig University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Fracture fixation. The author has an hindex of 24, co-authored 151 publications receiving 2095 citations. Previous affiliations of Georg Osterhoff include University of Zurich & University of British Columbia.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Influence of trabecular microstructure and cortical index on the complexity of proximal humeral fractures

TL;DR: In this study population local trabecular bone structure and cortical index could not predict the severity of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly.
Journal ArticleDOI

Symphyseal internal rod fixation versus standard plate fixation for open book pelvic ring injuries: a biomechanical study

TL;DR: In comparison to standard internal plate fixation for the stabilization of open book pelvic ring injuries, symphyseal internal rod fixation using a multiaxial spinal screw-rod implant in vitro shows a similar rigidity and comparable low degrees of displacement.
Journal ArticleDOI

Screw fixation of ACPHT acetabular fractures offers sufficient biomechanical stability when compared to standard buttress plate fixation

TL;DR: In this in vitro biomechanical study, screw-only fixation of an ACPHT acetabular fracture resulted in at least as good construct survival as seen for standard buttress plate fixation, and both methods resisted sufficiently to forces that would be expected under physiologic conditions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: an additional acromioclavicular cerclage does not improve horizontal stability in double coraco-clavicular tunnel technique.

TL;DR: Based on the results of this biomechanical in vitro study, the use of an additional acromioclavicular cerclage with single coraco-clavicular tunnel technique may not be indicated in most cases.
Journal ArticleDOI

The prevalence rates and adversities of delirium: Too common and disadvantageous.

TL;DR: The impact of delirium on patients is identified, the prevalence rates for 32 services are determined, and the association between individual services andDelirium is elucidated, suggesting novel screening approaches are required.