scispace - formally typeset
G

George A. Bonanno

Researcher at Columbia University

Publications -  269
Citations -  35756

George A. Bonanno is an academic researcher from Columbia University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Grief & Psychological resilience. The author has an hindex of 76, co-authored 250 publications receiving 30634 citations. Previous affiliations of George A. Bonanno include University of Hong Kong & University of British Columbia.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Loss, Trauma, and Human Resilience Have We Underestimated the Human Capacity to Thrive After Extremely Aversive Events?

TL;DR: Evidence is reviewed that resilience represents a distinct trajectory from the process of recovery, that resilience in the face of loss or potential trauma is more common than is often believed, and that there are multiple and sometimes unexpected pathways to resilience.
Journal ArticleDOI

Resilience definitions, theory, and challenges: interdisciplinary perspectives

TL;DR: In this paper, inspired by the plenary panel at the 2013 meeting of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, Steven Southwick and multidisciplinary panelists tackle some of the most pressing current questions in the field of resilience research including how do the authors define resilience, what are the most important determinants of resilience, and how are new technologies informing the science of resilience?
Journal ArticleDOI

What predicts psychological resilience after disaster? The role of demographics, resources, and life stress.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used data from a random-digit-dial phone survey (N = 2,752) conducted in the New York City area after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attack.
Journal ArticleDOI

Regulatory Flexibility: An Individual Differences Perspective on Coping and Emotion Regulation.

TL;DR: A heuristic individual differences framework is proposed and research on three sequential components of flexibility for which propensities and abilities vary are reviewed: sensitivity to context, availability of a diverse repertoire of regulatory strategies, and responsiveness to feedback.