G
Gerd Bruder
Researcher at University of Central Florida
Publications - 186
Citations - 4759
Gerd Bruder is an academic researcher from University of Central Florida. The author has contributed to research in topics: Virtual reality & Augmented reality. The author has an hindex of 31, co-authored 170 publications receiving 3514 citations. Previous affiliations of Gerd Bruder include University of Würzburg & University of Hamburg.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Estimation of Detection Thresholds for Redirected Walking Techniques
TL;DR: In psychophysical experiments with a two-alternative forced-choice task, it is quantified how much humans can unknowingly be redirected on physical paths that are different from the visually perceived paths.
Journal ArticleDOI
Revisiting Trends in Augmented Reality Research: A Review of the 2nd Decade of ISMAR (2008–2017)
TL;DR: The research results and trends of the last decade of ISMAR are considered by carefully reviewing the ISMAR publications from the period of 2008–2017, in the context of the first ten years.
Journal ArticleDOI
15 Years of Research on Redirected Walking in Immersive Virtual Environments
Niels Christian Nilsson,Tabitha C. Peck,Gerd Bruder,Eri Hodgson,Stefania Serafin,Mary C. Whitton,Frank Steinicke,Evan Suma Rosenberg +7 more
TL;DR: An overview of the research that has been performed since redirected walking was first practically demonstrated 15 years ago is given.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
A taxonomy for deploying redirection techniques in immersive virtual environments
TL;DR: A novel taxonomy is presented that separates redirection techniques according to their geometric flexibility versus the likelihood that they will be noticed by users and suggests that reorientation with change blindness illusions may give the impression of exploring a more expansive environment than continuous rotation techniques, but at the cost of negatively impacting spatial knowledge acquisition.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Analyses of human sensitivity to redirected walking
TL;DR: How much humans can unknowingly be redirected on virtual paths which are different from the paths they actually walk is quantified in a constant stimuli experiment with a two-alternative-forced-choice task.