scispace - formally typeset
G

Gernot Wagner

Researcher at Danube University Krems

Publications -  37
Citations -  1518

Gernot Wagner is an academic researcher from Danube University Krems. The author has contributed to research in topics: Systematic review & Medicine. The author has an hindex of 10, co-authored 29 publications receiving 883 citations. Previous affiliations of Gernot Wagner include University of Health Sciences Antigua.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Quarantine alone or in combination with other public health measures to control COVID-19: a rapid review.

TL;DR: A rapid review on the effectiveness of quarantine during severe coronavirus outbreaks found that quarantine is important in reducing incidence and mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Journal ArticleDOI

Impact of timing of surgery in elderly hip fracture patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

TL;DR: Early hip surgery within 48 hours was associated with lower mortality risk and fewer perioperative complications, and increasing risk for pressure ulcers with increased time of delay in another study.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effects of lifestyle changes on adults with prediabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

TL;DR: Lifestyle intervention is an efficacious, safe, and cost-effective measure to reduce the risk of progression to type 2 diabetes in people diagnosed with prediabetes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for major depressive disorder: review of systematic reviews

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors summarize the evidence on more than 140 pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment options for major depressive disorder (MDD) and evaluate the confidence that patients and clinicians can have in the underlying science about their effects.
Journal ArticleDOI

Restricting evidence syntheses of interventions to English-language publications is a viable methodological shortcut for most medical topics: a systematic review.

TL;DR: This article assessed the impact of restricting systematic reviews of conventional or alternative medical treatments or diagnostic tests to English-language publications on effect estimates and conclusions and found that restricting systematic review to English language publications appeared to have little impact on the effect estimates.