scispace - formally typeset
G

Gie Ken-Dror

Researcher at Tel Aviv University

Publications -  14
Citations -  516

Gie Ken-Dror is an academic researcher from Tel Aviv University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Internal medicine & Medicine. The author has an hindex of 5, co-authored 8 publications receiving 476 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system, optical low-coherence reflectometry pachymeter, and ultrasound pachymetry

TL;DR: Objective, noncontact measurement of central corneal thickness with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system and OLCR pachymeter was convenient and yielded excellent intraoperator repeatability and interoperator reproducibility.
Journal ArticleDOI

A coding VKORC1 Asp36Tyr polymorphism predisposes to warfarin resistance

TL;DR: It is suggested that Asp36Tyr is a new marker of the high end of the warfarin dosing range and was common in Jewish ethnic groups of Ethiopian and Ashkenazi origin.
Journal ArticleDOI

Different effects of apolipoprotein A5 SNPs and haplotypes on triglyceride concentration in three ethnic origins

TL;DR: It is suggested that different SNPs in ApoA5 polymorphisms may be associated with triglyceride concentration and CVD in each of these ethnic origins.
Journal Article

[Development of a Hebrew questionnaire to be used in epidemiological studies to assess physical fitness--validation against sub maximal stress test and predicted VO2max].

TL;DR: The self-administered questionnaire developed in this study has high construct validity and a significant correlation to predicted VO2max, with high sensitivity in both sexes and among active and non-active subjects, and is therefore an appropriate tool to be used in epidemiological studies.
Journal Article

Measurement and assessment of habitual physical activity in epidemiological studies

TL;DR: The greatest obstacle to validating field methods of assessing habitual physical activity or energy expenditure in humans has been the lack of adequate comparison criteria for the technique.