Giulia Landi

TL;DR: Results showed that after controlling for sociodemographic variables, global psychological flexibility and four of its sub-processes, mitigated the detrimental impacts of COVID-19 risk factors on mental health.

TL;DR: Findings suggest embracing (rather than avoiding) inner discomfort and observing associated unhelpful thoughts, while also engaging in values-based action, increases resilience during adversity, which is consistent with the ACT conceptualization of psychological flexibility.

TL;DR: This article analyzed the structure of psychological flexibility as assessed with the recently developed Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI) and examined its link with distress, finding that the AAQ-II is more of a measure of global distress than psychological inflexibility or by proxy, psychological flexibility.

TL;DR: The authors explored the trajectories of anxiety and depression over two consecutive lockdowns during the first nine months of the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe (April 2020-January 2021) and examined whether they varied as a function of psychological flexibility and inflexibility profiles.

TL;DR: The Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI) is a recently developed measure of psychological flexibility and inflexibility based on the psychological functioning model of behavior change that underpins Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT).