scispace - formally typeset
G

Glen Bandiera

Researcher at University of Toronto

Publications -  87
Citations -  3381

Glen Bandiera is an academic researcher from University of Toronto. The author has contributed to research in topics: Curriculum & International emergency medicine. The author has an hindex of 28, co-authored 84 publications receiving 2994 citations. Previous affiliations of Glen Bandiera include St. Michael's Hospital & St. Michael's GAA, Sligo.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Canadian C-Spine Rule versus the NEXUS Low-Risk Criteria in Patients with Trauma

TL;DR: For alert patients with trauma who are in stable condition, the CCR is superior to the NLC with respect to sensitivity and specificity for cervical-spine injury, and its use would result in reduced rates of radiography.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparison of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria in Patients With Minor Head Injury

TL;DR: For patients with minor head injury and GCS score of 15, the Canadian CT Head Rule and the NOC have equivalent high sensitivities for need for neurosurgical intervention and clinically important brain injury, but the CCHR has higher specificity for important clinical outcomes than does the N OC, and its use may result in reduced imaging rates.
Journal ArticleDOI

Threat and challenge: cognitive appraisal and stress responses in simulated trauma resuscitations.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors evaluated the relationship between cognitive appraisal and stress responses in complex realistic situations and found that cognitive appraisal affects a medical trainee's subjective and physiological stress responses to high-acuity simulated clinical situations.
Journal ArticleDOI

Impact of stress on resident performance in simulated trauma scenarios.

TL;DR: In trainees, some aspects of performance and immediate recall appear to be impaired in complex clinical scenarios in which they exhibit elevated subjective and physiologic stress responses.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Canadian C-Spine rule performs better than unstructured physician judgment

TL;DR: Interobserver agreement of unstructured clinical judgment for predicting clinically important cervical spine injury is only fair, and the sensitivity is unacceptably low, which should permit widespread use of the Canadian C-Spine rule.