scispace - formally typeset
G

George A. Wells

Researcher at University of Ottawa

Publications -  1004
Citations -  132992

George A. Wells is an academic researcher from University of Ottawa. The author has contributed to research in topics: Randomized controlled trial & Population. The author has an hindex of 149, co-authored 941 publications receiving 114256 citations. Previous affiliations of George A. Wells include Cochrane Collaboration & Ottawa Hospital.

Papers
More filters

The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses

TL;DR: The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) as discussed by the authors was developed to assess the quality of nonrandomised studies with its design, content and ease of use directed to the task of incorporating the quality assessments in the interpretation of meta-analytic results.
Journal ArticleDOI

ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.

TL;DR: Risk of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions is developed, a new tool for evaluating risk of bias in estimates of the comparative effectiveness of interventions from studies that did not use randomisation to allocate units or clusters of individuals to comparison groups.
Journal ArticleDOI

A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial of transfusion requirements in critical care. Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care Investigators, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group.

TL;DR: A restrictive strategy of red-cell transfusion is at least as effective as and possibly superior to a liberal transfusion strategy in critically ill patients, with the possible exception of patients with acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina.
Journal ArticleDOI

Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

TL;DR: A measurement tool for the 'assessment of multiple systematic reviews' (AMSTAR) was developed that consists of 11 items and has good face and content validity for measuring the methodological quality of systematic reviews.