scispace - formally typeset
G

Gregg T. Vesonder

Researcher at Stevens Institute of Technology

Publications -  51
Citations -  1480

Gregg T. Vesonder is an academic researcher from Stevens Institute of Technology. The author has contributed to research in topics: Expert system & Recall. The author has an hindex of 14, co-authored 51 publications receiving 1418 citations. Previous affiliations of Gregg T. Vesonder include AT&T & Bell Labs.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Text processing of domain-related information for individuals with high and low domain knowledge

TL;DR: This paper presents the detailed propositional analyses of the text employed in a study that compared the contents of recall protocols of highAnowledde (HK) and by knowledge (LK1 groups) and the results are presented.
Journal ArticleDOI

Text generation and recall by high-knowledge and low-knowledge individuals

TL;DR: The findings support the idea that domain-related knowledge has a similar influence upon the processes of text generation and comprehension, that such processes may be viewed in terms of a problem-solving framework, and that HK—LK performance differences are due to differences in the respective problem spaces.
Journal ArticleDOI

A knowledge-based configurator that supports sales, engineering, and manufacturing at AT&T Network Systems

TL;DR: The PROSE architecture is general and is not tied to any specific telecommunications product, as such, it is being reused to develop configurators for several different products.

Nfsight: netflow-based network awareness tool

TL;DR: The internal architecture of Nfsight, the evaluation of the service, and intrusion detection algorithms are presented, and several case studies conducted by security administrators on a large university network are illustrated.
Journal ArticleDOI

On the ability to predict one's own responses while learning

TL;DR: In this article, a multiple-trial, paired associate procedure, subjects predicted "yes" or "no" on each trial, and significant prediction accuracy was attributed to knowledge of items correctly recalled on Trial N-1, leading to “yes” predictions and correct recall on Trial n, and estimates of item difficulty.