H
Henry Han
Researcher at Fordham University
Publications - 14
Citations - 461
Henry Han is an academic researcher from Fordham University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Biomarker discovery & Principal component analysis. The author has an hindex of 7, co-authored 12 publications receiving 353 citations. Previous affiliations of Henry Han include Eastern Michigan University & Columbia University.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Multi-resolution independent component analysis for high-performance tumor classification and biomarker discovery.
Henry Han,Henry Han,Xiaoli Li +2 more
TL;DR: This work suggests a new direction to accelerate microarray technologies into a clinical routine through building a high-performance classifier to attain clinical-level sensitivities and specificities by treating an input profile as a ‘profile-biomarker’.
Journal ArticleDOI
Application of t-SNE to human genetic data.
TL;DR: The ability for t-SNE to reveal population stratification at different scales could be useful for human genetic association studies.
Journal ArticleDOI
Nonnegative principal component analysis for mass spectral serum profiles and biomarker discovery.
TL;DR: The analysis suggests that nonnegative principal component analysis effectively conduct local feature selection for mass spectral profiles and contribute to improving sensitivities and specificities in the following classification, and meaningful biomarker discovery.
Journal ArticleDOI
A Systematic Way to Infer the Regulation Relations of miRNAs on Target Genes and Critical miRNAs in Cancers.
TL;DR: A miRNA influence capturing (miRNAInf) is proposed to decipher regulation relations of miRNAAs on target genes and identify critical miRNAs in cancers in a systematic approach.
Journal ArticleDOI
Derivative component analysis for mass spectral serum proteomic profiles.
Henry Han,Henry Han +1 more
TL;DR: The results show that high-dimensional proteomics data are actually linearly separable under proposed derivative component analysis (DCA), which suggests the subtle data characteristics gleaning and de-noising are essential in separating true signals from red herrings for high- dimensional proteomic profiles, which can be more important than the conventional feature selection or dimension reduction.