scispace - formally typeset
I

Inger Natvig Norderhaug

Researcher at University of Oslo

Publications -  61
Citations -  2076

Inger Natvig Norderhaug is an academic researcher from University of Oslo. The author has contributed to research in topics: Systematic review & Evidence-based medicine. The author has an hindex of 16, co-authored 61 publications receiving 1954 citations. Previous affiliations of Inger Natvig Norderhaug include University of Tromsø & SINTEF.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Absence of Epithelial Immunoglobulin a Transport, with Increased Mucosal Leakiness, in Polymeric Immunoglobulin Receptor/Secretory Component–Deficient Mice

TL;DR: Complete lack of active external IgA and IgM translocation in pIgR knockout mice is reported, indicating no redundancy in epithelial transport mechanisms and production of SIgA might be a variable in the initiation of human immunopathology such as inflammatory bowel disease or gluten-sensitive enteropathy.
Journal ArticleDOI

The B‐cell system of human mucosae and exocrine glands

TL;DR: The mucosae and exocrine glands harbour the largest activated B‐cell system of the body, amounting to some 80–90% of all immunoglobulins (Ig)‐producing cells, and the origin of regionalized homing of B cells to secretory effector sites outside the gut remains elusive.
Journal ArticleDOI

Regulation of the formation and external transport of secretory immunoglobulins.

TL;DR: Generation of SIgA and SIgM in exocrine glands and mucous membranes depends on a fascinating cooperation between local plasma cells that produce polymeric IgA and pentameric IgM, and secretory epithelial cells that express thepolymeric Ig receptor (pIgR)--also known as transmembrane secretory component.
Journal ArticleDOI

Proton therapy – A systematic review of clinical effectiveness

TL;DR: Proton therapy offers the option to deliver higher radiation doses and/or better confinement of the treatment of intracranial tumours in children and adults, but reported studies are heterogeneous in design and do not allow for strict conclusions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Rapid reviews versus full systematic reviews: An inventory of current methods and practice in health technology assessment

TL;DR: Axiomatic trends were identified, but there was little cohesion between organizations regarding the contents, methods, and definition of a rapid review, and authors suggested restricted research questions and truncated search strategies as methods to limit the time taken to complete a review.