Criteria for the evaluation of dental implant success are proposed These criteria are applied in an assessment of the long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants including the subperiosteal implant, the vitreous carbon implant, the blade-vent implant, the single-crystal sapphire implant, the Tubingen implant, the TCP-implant, the TPS-screw, the ITI hollow-cylinder implant, the IMZ dental implant, the Core-Vent titanium alloy implant, the transosteal mandibular staple bone plate, and the Branemark osseointegrated titanium implant An attempt has been made to standardize the basis for comments on each type of implant

https://coimplante.odo.br/Biblioteca/Trabalhos%20classicos/A%20review%20and%20proposed%20a%20criteria%20of%20success%20-%20Albrektson%20et%20al.pdf

The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success.

Osteoinduction is the process by which osteogenesis is induced. It is a phenomenon regularly seen in any type of bone healing process. Osteoinduction implies the recruitment of immature cells and the stimulation of these cells to develop into preosteoblasts. In a bone healing situation such as a fracture, the majority of bone healing is dependent on osteoinduction. Osteoconduction means that bone grows on a surface. This phenomenon is regularly seen in the case of bone implants. Implant materials of low biocompatibility such as copper, silver and bone cement shows little or no osteoconduction. Osseointegration is the stable anchorage of an implant achieved by direct bone-to-implant contact. In craniofacial implantology, this mode of anchorage is the only one for which high success rates have been reported. Osseointegration is possible in other parts of the body, but its importance for the anchorage of major arthroplasties is under debate. Ingrowth of bone in a porous-coated prosthesis may or may not represent osseointegration.

/pdf/osteoinduction-osteoconduction-and-osseointegration-1aufckjsjh.pdf

Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration.

On the basis of the previous discussions, several conclusions may be drawn. 1. The close apposition of bone to the titanium implant is the essential feature that allows a transmission of stress from the implant to the bone without any appreciable relative motion or abrasion. The absence of any intermediate fibrotic layer allows stress to be transmitted without any progressive change in the bond or contact between the bone and implant. 2. The use of a threaded screw provides a form of interlocking with the bone on a macroscopic scale that allows full development of the strength of the bone in shear or compression. A smooth, cylindrical implant may require an adhesive bond for satisfactory performance, but a screw shape is able to work as long as the apposition of bone and implant is close, whether or not a true adhesive bond is developed. 3. The distribution of a vertical or lateral load applied to a fixed partial denture depends on the number, arrangement, and stiffness of abutment fixtures used, as well as the form and stiffness of the fixed prosthesis itself. In general a stiff fixed partial denture will distribute loads to several fixtures more effectively. A flexible prosthesis may be adequate if the strength developed by each fixture is able to carry the full load that is applied. Cantilevered ends of a fixed partial denture increases the loading on the first screw nearest the cantilevered end. Moderate overhangs may be tolerated if the fixtures are sufficiently strong. 4. A tight connection of the fixed partial denture to fixtures provides a combined structure that can act in concert with the bone to provide a greater strength than that of the fixture or the jaw bone alone. 5. The osseointegrated implant provides a direct contact with bone and therefore will transmit any stress waves or shocks applied to the fixtures. For this reason it is advisable to use a shock-absorbing material such as acrylic resin in the form of acrylic resin artificial teeth in the fixed partial denture. This arrangement allows for the development of a stiff and strong substructure with adequate shock protection on its outer surface.

Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses.

Biocompatibility of titanium implants: Surface science aspects

Characteristics of the surface oxides on turned and electrochemically oxidized pure titanium implants up to dielectric breakdown: the oxide thickness, micropore configurations, surface roughness, crystal structure and chemical composition.

The interface zone between titanium implants and bone is considered at the macroscopic, microscopic, and molecular levels. A high rate of successful dental implants of pure titanium is associated with a very close apposition of the bone to the titanium surface, called osseointegration. At the macroscopic level, osseointegration allows efficient stress transfer from the implant to the bone without abrasion or progressive movement that can take place if a fibrous layer intervenes. At the microscopic level, surface roughness and porosity provide interlocking of the implant and bone tissue which grows into direct contact with titanium. Sections studied in the electron microscope show that calcified tissue can be identified within 50 A of the implant surface. The interface zone includes a tightly adherent titanium oxide layer on the surface of the implant which may be similar to a ceramic material in relation to tissue response. The five year success rate of 90% in 2895 implants in clinical trials since 1965 is associated with the favorable behavior of bone tissue at the interface zone with pure titanium.

Ingmar Lundström

Papers

The interface zone of inorganic implants in vivo: Titanium implants in bone.