METHODS In this phase 3, open-label study, we randomly assigned previously untreated patients in East Asia who had advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma and who were nonsmokers or former light smokers to receive gefitinib (250 mg per day) (609 patients) or carboplatin (at a dose calculated to produce an area under the curve of 5 or 6 mg per milliliter per minute) plus paclitaxel (200 mg per square meter of body-surface area) (608 patients). The primary end point was progression-free survival. RESULTS The 12-month rates of progression-free survival were 24.9% with gefitinib and 6.7% with carboplatin–paclitaxel. The study met its primary objective of showing the noninferiority of gefitinib and also showed its superiority, as compared with carboplatin– paclitaxel, with respect to progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65 to 0.85; P<0.001). In the subgroup of 261 patients who were positive for the epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) mutation, progression-free survival was significantly longer among those who received gefitinib than among those who received carboplatin–paclitaxel (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.64; P<0.001), whereas in the subgroup of 176 patients who were negative for the mutation, progression-free survival was significantly longer among those who received carboplatin–paclitaxel (hazard ratio for progression or death with gefitinib, 2.85; 95% CI, 2.05 to 3.98; P<0.001). The most common adverse events were rash or acne (in 66.2% of patients) and diarrhea (46.6%) in the gefitinib group and neurotoxic effects (69.9%), neutropenia (67.1%), and alopecia (58.4%) in the carboplatin–paclitaxel group. CONCLUSIONS Gefitinib is superior to carboplatin–paclitaxel as an initial treatment for pulmonary adenocarcinoma among nonsmokers or former light smokers in East Asia. The presence in the tumor of a mutation of the EGFR gene is a strong predictor of a better outcome with gefitinib. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00322452.)

https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa0810699

Gefitinib or Carboplatin–Paclitaxel in Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma

Prospective Cohort Study

In the planned interim analysis of data for the first 200 patients, progression-free survival was significantly longer in the gefitinib group than in the standard-chemotherapy group (hazard ratio for death or disease progression with gefitinib, 0.36; P<0.001), resulting in early termination of the study. The gefitinib group had a significantly longer median progression-free survival (10.8 months, vs. 5.4 months in the chemotherapy group; hazard ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.22 to 0.41; P<0.001), as well as a higher response rate (73.7% vs. 30.7%, P<0.001). The median overall survival was 30.5 months in the gefitinib group and 23.6 months in the chemotherapy group (P = 0.31). The most common adverse events in the gefitinib group were rash (71.1%) and elevated amino transferase levels (55.3%), and in the chemotherapy group, neutropenia (77.0%), anemia (64.6%), appetite loss (56.6%), and sensory neuropathy (54.9%). One patient receiving gefitinib died from interstitial lung disease. CONCLUSIONS First-line gefitinib for patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer who were selected on the basis of EGFR mutations improved progression-free survival, with acceptable toxicity, as compared with standard chemotherapy. (UMIN-CTR number, C000000376.)

/pdf/gefitinib-or-chemotherapy-for-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-3i0ao547wt.pdf

Gefitinib or Chemotherapy for Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Mutated EGFR

Summary Background Erlotinib has been shown to improve progression-free survival compared with chemotherapy when given as first-line treatment for Asian patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with activating EGFR mutations. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of erlotinib compared with standard chemotherapy for first-line treatment of European patients with advanced EGFR-mutation positive NSCLC. Methods We undertook the open-label, randomised phase 3 EURTAC trial at 42 hospitals in France, Italy, and Spain. Eligible participants were adults (>18 years) with NSCLC and EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation in exon 21) with no history of chemotherapy for metastatic disease (neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy ending ≥6 months before study entry was allowed). We randomly allocated participants (1:1) according to a computer-generated allocation schedule to receive oral erlotinib 150 mg per day or 3 week cycles of standard intravenous chemotherapy of cisplatin 75 mg/m 2 on day 1 plus docetaxel (75 mg/m 2 on day 1) or gemcitabine (1250 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8). Carboplatin (AUC 6 with docetaxel 75 mg/m 2 or AUC 5 with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m 2 ) was allowed in patients unable to have cisplatin. Patients were stratified by EGFR mutation type and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0 vs 1 vs 2). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in the intention-to-treat population. We assessed safety in all patients who received study drug (≥1 dose). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00446225. Findings Between Feb 15, 2007, and Jan 4, 2011, 174 patients with EGFR mutations were enrolled. One patient received treatment before randomisation and was thus withdrawn from the study; of the remaining patients, 86 were randomly assigned to receive erlotinib and 87 to receive standard chemotherapy. The preplanned interim analysis showed that the study met its primary endpoint; enrolment was halted, and full evaluation of the results was recommended. At data cutoff (Jan 26, 2011), median PFS was 9·7 months (95% CI 8·4-12·3) in the erlotinib group, compared with 5·2 months (4·5–5·8) in the standard chemotherapy group (hazard ratio 0·37, 95% CI 0·25–0·54; p vs none of 82 patients in the chemotherapy group), neutropenia (none vs 18 [22%]), anaemia (one [1%] vs three [4%]), and increased amino-transferase concentrations (two [2%] vs 0). Five (6%) patients on erlotinib had treatment-related severe adverse events compared with 16 patients (20%) on chemotherapy. One patient in the erlotinib group and two in the standard chemotherapy group died from treatment-related causes. Interpretation Our findings strengthen the rationale for routine baseline tissue-based assessment of EGFR mutations in patients with NSCLC and for treatment of mutation-positive patients with EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors. Funding Spanish Lung Cancer Group, Roche Farma, Hoffmann-La Roche, and Red Tematica de Investigacion Cooperativa en Cancer.

/pdf/erlotinib-versus-standard-chemotherapy-as-first-line-1hii4s3lek.pdf

Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial.

https://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-00561753/document

International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society International Multidisciplinary Classification of Lung Adenocarcinoma

Introduction: Febrile episodes in patients with cancer and chemotherapy-induced neutropenia can be life-threatening and generally require prompt administration of broad-spectrum antimicrobials. However, little evidence exists for treating patients with solid tumors and febrile neutropenia (FN) with oral antimicrobials. Methods: In this prospective study, we aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of sitafloxacin (STFX) for treating FN in lung cancer patients. In this prospective study, low-risk FN patients with lung cancer received STFX. The primary endpoint was response rate, defined as 5 sequential days of absence of fever without adverse events. The study was registered as UMIN000010911. Results: As a result, STFX was administered to 26 patients, all of whom survived during its administration. Of the 26, 14 completed primary endpoint (53.85%). The low response rate was attributed to occurrence of fevers of unknown cause rather than failure of FN treatment. Only two patients received antibacterial agents other than STFX. If response rate omitted absence of fever and been defined only as recovery from FN without changing microbial agents or serious complications, the response rate would have been 91.67%. Adverse events occurred in eight patients, none of which were serious. Conclusions: In conclusion, STFX might be used to treat low-risk FN in patients with lung cancer; however, a more detailed study will be required in future.

Efficacy and Safety of Sitafloxacin in Treating Low-risk Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Lung Cancer

PURPOSE
Plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis is used for genotyping advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); monitoring dynamic ctDNA changes may be used to predict outcomes.


EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
This was a retrospective, exploratory analysis of two phase III trials (AURA3 [NCT02151981], FLAURA [NCT02296125]). All patients had epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive (ex19del or L858R; EGFRm) advanced NSCLC; AURA3 also included T790M-positive NSCLC. Osimertinib (FLAURA, AURA3), or comparator EGFR-TKI (gefitinib/erlotinib; FLAURA), or platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (AURA3) was given. Plasma EGFRm was analyzed at baseline and Weeks 3/6 by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction. Outcomes were assessed by detectable/non-detectable baseline plasma EGFRm and plasma EGFRm clearance (non-detection) at Weeks 3/6.


RESULTS
In AURA3 (n=291), non-detectable versus detectable baseline plasma EGFRm had longer median progression-free survival (mPFS) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33-0.68; P<0.0001). In patients with Week 3 clearance versus non-clearance (n=184), respectively, mPFS (months; 95% CI) was 10.9 (8.3-12.6) versus 5.7 (4.1-9.7) with osimertinib and 6.2 (4.0-9.7) versus 4.2 (4.0-5.1) with platinum-pemetrexed. In FLAURA (n=499), mPFS was longer with non-detectable versus detectable baseline plasma EGFRm (HR 0.54; 95% CI, 0.41-0.70; P<0.0001). For Week 3 clearance versus non-clearance (n=334), respectively, mPFS was 19.8 (15.1 to not calculable) versus 11.3 (9.5-16.5) with osimertinib and 10.8 (9.7-11.1) versus 7.0 (5.6-8.3) with comparator EGFR-TKI. Similar outcomes were observed by Week 6 clearance/non-clearance.


CONCLUSIONS
Plasma EGFRm analysis as early as 3 weeks on-treatment has the potential to predict outcomes in EGFRm advanced NSCLC.

Early Clearance of Plasma Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations as a Predictor of Outcome on Osimertinib in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer; Exploratory Analysis from AURA3 and FLAURA.

BACKGROUND
The Oncomine Dx Target Test Multi-CDx System (ODxTT) is a next-generation sequencing panel approved as a companion diagnostic for drugs targeted to corresponding gene alterations in non-small cell lung cancer. However, appropriate slide conditions for ODxTT have remained unclear.


METHODS
We focused on the production of the number of tumor cells on a formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) section and the number of prepared slides, designated the TS value, and determined a TS value of ≥4000 as a target slide condition for ODxTT. We evaluated the impact of this condition on ODxTT testing with tumor specimens found to have a TS of <4000 (n = 23) or a TS of ≥4000 (n = 142).


RESULTS
A positive correlation was apparent between the TS value and the concentrations of both DNA and RNA. Among the 142 samples with a TS of ≥4000, a sufficient concentration of DNA or RNA for ODxTT analysis was achieved in 100% and 98% samples, respectively. Among samples explored for driver gene alterations after determination of the target slide condition (TS ≥4000), most (84.9%) had a TS of ≥4000 and were submitted for ODxTT analysis.


CONCLUSION
Our findings indicate that a TS of ≥4000 is a feasible and relevant criterion for ODxTT testing, and its adoption should help to improve the success rate of such testing in clinical practice.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/1759-7714.15014

Isamu Okamoto

Papers

Efficacy and Safety of Sitafloxacin in Treating Low-risk Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Lung Cancer

Early Clearance of Plasma Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations as a Predictor of Outcome on Osimertinib in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer; Exploratory Analysis from AURA3 and FLAURA.

Evaluation of appropriate conditions for Oncomine DxTT testing of FFPE specimens for driver gene alterations in non-small cell lung cancer.