scispace - formally typeset
J

J. David Roessner

Researcher at Georgia Institute of Technology

Publications -  40
Citations -  1891

J. David Roessner is an academic researcher from Georgia Institute of Technology. The author has contributed to research in topics: High tech & Government. The author has an hindex of 17, co-authored 39 publications receiving 1702 citations. Previous affiliations of J. David Roessner include University of Southern California & SRI International.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature

TL;DR: This literature review began with a narrow search for quantitative measures of the output of IDR that could contribute to indicators, but the authors expanded the scope of the review as it became clear that differing definitions, assessment tools, evaluation processes, and measures all shed light on different aspects ofIDR.
Journal ArticleDOI

Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity

TL;DR: Two metrics that together help gauge how interdisciplinary a body of research is are offered, which draw upon Web of Knowledge Subject Categories (SCs) as key units of analysis.
Journal ArticleDOI

Impacts of research universities on technological innovation in industry: evidence from engineering research centers

TL;DR: In this article, surveys and interviews with 355 firms participating in the 18 ERCs established between 1985 and 1990 indicate that firms participate primarily to gain access to upstream modes of knowledge rather than specific products and processes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Measuring national ‘emerging technology’ capabilities

TL;DR: The authors used INSPEC and EI Compendex class codes to examine 33 countries' research and development activity and found that China now stands forth as an emerging technology research power comparable to Germany, the UK, and France.
Journal ArticleDOI

Current practices in the evaluation of US industrial modernization programs

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine current practices used in the evaluation of US industrial modernization programs at state and national levels, drawing on interviews with program managers, site visits, and scrutiny of available studies.