Chemotherapeutics are the most effective treatment for metastatic tumours. However, the ability of cancer cells to become simultaneously resistant to different drugs--a trait known as multidrug resistance--remains a significant impediment to successful chemotherapy. Three decades of multidrug-resistance research have identified a myriad of ways in which cancer cells can elude chemotherapy, and it has become apparent that resistance exists against every effective drug, even our newest agents. Therefore, the ability to predict and circumvent drug resistance is likely to improve chemotherapy.

/pdf/multidrug-resistance-in-cancer-role-of-atp-dependent-1hpqky19xf.pdf

Multidrug resistance in cancer: role of ATP–dependent transporters

The glutathione S-transferases (GST) represent a major group of detoxification enzymes. All eukaryotic species possess multiple cytosolic and membrane-bound GST isoenzymes, each of which displays distinct catalytic as well as noncatalytic binding properties: the cytosolic enzymes are encoded by at least five distantly related gene families (designated class alpha, mu, pi, sigma, and theta GST), whereas the membrane-bound enzymes, microsomal GST and leukotriene C, synthetase, are encoded by single genes and both have arisen separately from the soluble GST. Evidence suggests that the level of expression of GST is a crucial factor in determining the sensitivity of cells to a broad spectrum of toxic chemicals. In this article the biochemical functions of GST are described to show how individual isoenzymes contribute to resistance to carcinogens, antitumor drugs, environmental pollutants, and products of oxidative stress.A description of the mechanisms of transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulat...

The glutathione S-transferase supergene family: regulation of GST and the contribution of the isoenzymes to cancer chemoprotection and drug resistance.

A newly described coronavirus named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which is the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has infected over 2.3 million people, led to the death of more than 160,000 individuals and caused worldwide social and economic disruption1,2. There are no antiviral drugs with proven clinical efficacy for the treatment of COVID-19, nor are there any vaccines that prevent infection with SARS-CoV-2, and efforts to develop drugs and vaccines are hampered by the limited knowledge of the molecular details of how SARS-CoV-2 infects cells. Here we cloned, tagged and expressed 26 of the 29 SARS-CoV-2 proteins in human cells and identified the human proteins that physically associated with each of the SARS-CoV-2 proteins using affinity-purification mass spectrometry, identifying 332 high-confidence protein–protein interactions between SARS-CoV-2 and human proteins. Among these, we identify 66 druggable human proteins or host factors targeted by 69 compounds (of which, 29 drugs are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, 12 are in clinical trials and 28 are preclinical compounds). We screened a subset of these in multiple viral assays and found two sets of pharmacological agents that displayed antiviral activity: inhibitors of mRNA translation and predicted regulators of the sigma-1 and sigma-2 receptors. Further studies of these host-factor-targeting agents, including their combination with drugs that directly target viral enzymes, could lead to a therapeutic regimen to treat COVID-19. A human–SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map highlights cellular processes that are hijacked by the virus and that can be targeted by existing drugs, including inhibitors of mRNA translation and predicted regulators of the sigma receptors.

/pdf/a-sars-cov-2-protein-interaction-map-reveals-targets-for-5d1m2n6hc1.pdf

A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing.

Beneath the complexity and idiopathy of every cancer lies a limited number of 'mission critical' events that have propelled the tumour cell and its progeny into uncontrolled expansion and invasion One of these is deregulated cell proliferation, which, together with the obligate compensatory suppression of apoptosis needed to support it, provides a minimal 'platform' necessary to support further neoplastic progression Adroit targeting of these critical events should have potent and specific therapeutic consequences

Proliferation, cell cycle and apoptosis in cancer

Effective treatment of metastatic cancers usually requires the use of toxic chemotherapy. In most cases, multiple drugs are used, as resistance to single agents occurs almost universally. For this reason, elucidation of mechanisms that confer simultaneous resistance to different drugs with different targets and chemical structures - multidrug resistance - has been a major goal of cancer biologists during the past 35 years. Here, we review the most common of these mechanisms, one that relies on drug efflux from cancer cells mediated by ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. We describe various approaches to combating multidrug-resistant cancer, including the development of drugs that engage, evade or exploit efflux by ABC transporters.

Targeting multidrug resistance in cancer

Anthracycline-resistant HL-60/AR cells and their drug-sensitive HL-60/S counterparts were characterized by karyotypic analysis and examined for the overexpression of DNA and mRNA sequences coding for P-glycoprotein (Pgp). The HL-60/S cells were karyotypically stable over a 5-year period of study (1986–1991), except for an additional small Giemsa-positive band noted at 7q22 in cultures harvested in 1987, but not in 1986. This change did not affect drug sensitivity. The drug-resistant HL-60/AR cells examined in 1986, 1987, and 1991 demonstrated a very stable karyotype. The most striking feature was a large homogeneously staining region in the long arm of chromosome 7 (7q11.2), and translocation of the remainder of the long arm to another centromere. Other changes in the HL-60/AR cells included inversion in 9q, partial deletion of the short arm of chromosome 10p, addition of material to the p arm of der(16), loss of chromosome 22, and the appearance of a new marker chromosome. Both HL-60/S and the HL-60/AR cells were found not to amplify DNA or mRNA sequences coding for the Pgp. Thus, although the HL-60/AR cells possess the classical multidrug resistance phenotype and demonstrate a homogeneously staining region near the region of the MDR1 gene, their resistance is due to mechanisms other than those coded for by MDR1.

https://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/canres/52/19/5244.full.pdf

Homogeneously staining region in anthracycline-resistant HL-60/AR cells not associated with MDR1 amplification.

Acquired resistance to chemotherapy is the major obstacle to cure of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Some of the most active drugs in the treatment of this tumor exert their cytotoxicity by interacting with the nuclear enzyme topoisomerase II (topo II), which in mammalian cells occurs in two isoforms, alpha and beta. We examined the relationship between levels of topo II alpha and beta and drug response in a panel of 25 unselected SCLC cell lines. Chemosensitivity to several topo II-interactive drugs, as well as other chemotherapeutic agents, was quantitated previously using a modified MTT assay. Topo II levels were determined by immunoblot analysis of whole cell lysates, with topo II alpha and beta isoform-specific antibodies, and results were expressed relative to levels found in NCI-H209 cells which had the highest topo II alpha in this series of cell lines. Levels of topo II alpha and beta mRNA were determined by Northern blotting. Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine the significance of the relationship between topo II alpha and beta levels and response to the various chemotherapeutic drugs, as well as the treatment history of the patients from whom the cell lines were derived. These analyses revealed an inverse correlation between topo II alpha levels and resistance to all of the tested drugs, including several drugs which are not known to interact with topo II. This correlation was statistically significant for doxorubicin, cisplatin, epirubicin, melphalan, nitrogen mustard, and vinblastine. With one exception (cisplatin), there were no significant correlations between topo II beta levels and drug response. There was no significant correlation between topo II alpha and beta levels and treatment history. Taken together, our results are consistent with the hypothesis that levels of topo II alpha are important determinants of drug response in SCLC.

Topoisomerase II levels and drug response in small cell lung cancer

Tumourigenic multidrug-resistant HT1080 cells do not overexpress receptors for epidermal growth factor

Tumourigenic multidrug-resistant HT1080 cells do not overexpress receptors for epidermal growth factor.

2 – P-Glycoprotein and Resistance to Anticancer Drugs

putative HSR near the normal cellularlocus for EGFR on the short arm of chromosome 7.Although the relationship between drug resistance andtumourigenicity remains unclear, these data and those ofothers (Miyamoto, 1986; Mirski et al., 1987; Hill et al., 1988)support the idea that drug resistance and the loss oftumourigenicity should be regarded as two independentevents (Remy et al., 1984).Several biochemi&al mechanisms in addition to P-glyco-protein have been proposed to explain the MDRphenotype.These include quantitative or qualitative alterations of DNA

James H. Gerlach

Papers

Homogeneously staining region in anthracycline-resistant HL-60/AR cells not associated with MDR1 amplification.

Topoisomerase II levels and drug response in small cell lung cancer

Tumourigenic multidrug-resistant HT1080 cells do not overexpress receptors for epidermal growth factor.

2 – P-Glycoprotein and Resistance to Anticancer Drugs

HT1080cells donotoverexpress receptors forepidermal growth factor