scispace - formally typeset
J

James J. Johnson

Researcher at Illinois State University

Publications -  13
Citations -  152

James J. Johnson is an academic researcher from Illinois State University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Predictive validity & School psychology. The author has an hindex of 8, co-authored 13 publications receiving 151 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Graduate Record Examination Scores and Academic Background Variables as Predictors of Graduate Degree Completion

TL;DR: This article investigated the predictive validity of GRE scores and academic background variables for graduate degree completion in psychology and found that the predictor variables did not predict similarly for all graduate students in psychology, and the results of this study have implications for faculty involved in the selection of students for graduate study in psychology.
Journal ArticleDOI

Predictive validity of the graduate record examination for performance in selected graduate psychology courses

TL;DR: This paper evaluated the predictive validity of the GRE for performance in selected graduate courses in psychology and found that while over-all predictive validity may be relatively low, there may in fact be some courses for which validity coefficients are considerably higher.
Journal ArticleDOI

Further Evidence of the Stability of the Verbalizer-Visualizer Questionnaire

TL;DR: Significant reliability coefficients for the Verbalizer-Visualizer Questionnaire of .36, .52, and .47 were obtained after 16 wk.
Journal ArticleDOI

Predictive validity of graduate record examination scores and undergraduate grades for length of time to completion of degree

TL;DR: This paper investigated the predictive relationship between GRE scores, cumulative undergraduate grade point average, and the length of time (in semesters) from the initiation of graduate study until final completion of a master's degree.
Journal ArticleDOI

Preference for an Approach to Counseling

TL;DR: There was a statistically significant preference for the behavioral approach by both Internals and Externals, and the major factor in the preference appeared to be the “structure” of the behavioral frame of reference.