J
James Kenneth Byrd
Researcher at Georgia Regents University
Publications - 9
Citations - 231
James Kenneth Byrd is an academic researcher from Georgia Regents University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Transoral robotic surgery & Robotic surgery. The author has an hindex of 4, co-authored 9 publications receiving 116 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Heterogeneity of the Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Immune Landscape and Its Impact on Immunotherapy.
Madison Canning,Gang Guo,Miao Yu,Calvin Wint Maung Myint,Michael W. Groves,James Kenneth Byrd,Yan Cui +6 more
TL;DR: There is an urgent and unmet need for the identification of specific molecular signatures that better predict the clinical outcomes and markers that serve as better therapeutic targets for HNSCC patients with recurrent disease.
Journal ArticleDOI
CSF Leak After COVID-19 Nasopharyngeal Swab: A Case Report.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors describe a case in which a young woman sustained a traumatic skull base injury during a nasopharyngeal swab for COVID-19, and discuss the subsequent treatment and outcome.
Journal ArticleDOI
The feasibility of pediatric TORS for lingual thyroglossal duct cyst.
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that with the correct circumstances, prompt extubation, discharge, and prolonged remission are possible in a six-year-old boy who presented with symptoms of obstructive sleep apnea and a midline tongue mass suspicious for lingual thyroglossal duct cyst.
Journal ArticleDOI
Transcervical arterial ligation for prevention of postoperative hemorrhage in transoral oropharyngectomy: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
Daniel D. Sharbel,Mary Abkemeier,James Sullivan,Zach Zimmerman,William G. Albergotti,Umamaheswar Duvvuri,James Kenneth Byrd +6 more
TL;DR: Transcervical arterial ligation has been studied as a useful procedure to prevent bleeding events after transoral robotic surgery (TORS).
Journal ArticleDOI
Cost Considerations for Robotic Surgery
TL;DR: The early data suggest that TORS is a cost-effective method compared with other available options when used in appropriately selected patients.