J
Jan-Frederik Güth
Researcher at Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
Publications - 85
Citations - 2562
Jan-Frederik Güth is an academic researcher from Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Ceramic. The author has an hindex of 24, co-authored 68 publications receiving 1898 citations. Previous affiliations of Jan-Frederik Güth include Goethe University Frankfurt.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing
TL;DR: The method of direct digitalisation seems to have the potential to improve the accuracy of impressions for four-unit FDPs and showed statistically significantly higher accuracy compared to the conventional procedure of impression taking and indirect digitalisation.
Journal ArticleDOI
Evaluation of mechanical and optical behavior of current esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM composites.
TL;DR: CAM composites presented moderate FS, high T and antagonist friendly behavior, and glass-ceramics demonstrated the most favorable DR and lowest TBW on the material side.
Journal ArticleDOI
Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a comparative in vitro study.
TL;DR: T titanium implants showed higher wear at the implant interface following cyclic loading when connected to one-piece zirconia implant abutments compared to titanium abutment, hence damage of the internal implant connection could result in prosthetic failures up to the need of implant removal.
Journal ArticleDOI
Marginal and internal fit of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques.
Júnio S. Almeida e Silva,Júnio S. Almeida e Silva,Kurt Erdelt,Daniel Edelhoff,Élito Araújo,Michael Stimmelmayr,Luiz Clovis Cardoso Vieira,Jan-Frederik Güth +7 more
TL;DR: The results of this in vitro study show that digital impressions made with the LavaTM C.O.S. system and its digital workflow are suitable for fabricating four-unit zirconia frameworks, with regard to marginal and internal fit requirements.
Journal ArticleDOI
Accuracy of five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digitalization.
Jan-Frederik Güth,Cornelius Runkel,Florian Beuer,Michael Stimmelmayr,Daniel Edelhoff,Christine Keul +5 more
TL;DR: The direct digitalization was not superior to indirect digitalization for all tested systems, and all tested intraoral scanning technologies seem to be able to reproduce a single quadrant within clinical acceptable accuracy.