scispace - formally typeset
J

Jane B. Singer

Researcher at City University London

Publications -  104
Citations -  6139

Jane B. Singer is an academic researcher from City University London. The author has contributed to research in topics: Journalism & Newspaper. The author has an hindex of 36, co-authored 101 publications receiving 5728 citations. Previous affiliations of Jane B. Singer include University of Iowa & Colorado State University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

PARTICIPATORY JOURNALISM PRACTICES IN THE MEDIA AND BEYOND An international comparative study of initiatives in online newspapers

TL;DR: In this article, the authors make conceptual sense of the phenomenon of participatory journalism in the framework of journalism research, and determine the forms that it is taking in eight European countries and the United States.
Journal ArticleDOI

The political j-blogger ‘Normalizing’ a new media form to fit old norms and practices

TL;DR: This paper explored how the increasingly popular blog format, as adopted by journalists affiliated with mainstream media outlets, affects long-standing journalistic norms and practice, focusing on nonpartisanship, transparency and the gatekeeping role.
Book

Participatory Journalism: Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers

TL;DR: This study explores the role of the "active recipient" in participatory journalism in the Marketplace and the economic motivations behind the practices of journalists' motivations and organizational structures.
Journal ArticleDOI

User-generated visibility: Secondary gatekeeping in a shared media space

TL;DR: This article explores implications of the transition to an environment in which users have become secondary gatekeepers of the content published on media websites, and preliminary empirical evidence indicates these user gatekeeping capabilities are now pervasive on US newspaper sites.
Journal ArticleDOI

Who are these guys?: The online challenge to the notion of journalistic professionalism

TL;DR: This paper argued that the distinction between practitioner and layperson should be clearly recognized by all parties. But they also pointed out that people who claim membership in a profession and delineate its attributes do so at least in part to justify inequality of status, as well as to limit and control access to that status.