Denitrification is a distinct means of energy conservation, making use of N oxides as terminal electron acceptors for cellular bioenergetics under anaerobic, microaerophilic, and occasionally aerobic conditions. The process is an essential branch of the global N cycle, reversing dinitrogen fixation, and is associated with chemolithotrophic, phototrophic, diazotrophic, or organotrophic metabolism but generally not with obligately anaerobic life. Discovered more than a century ago and believed to be exclusively a bacterial trait, denitrification has now been found in halophilic and hyperthermophilic archaea and in the mitochondria of fungi, raising evolutionarily intriguing vistas. Important advances in the biochemical characterization of denitrification and the underlying genetics have been achieved with Pseudomonas stutzeri, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Paracoccus denitrificans, Ralstonia eutropha, and Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Pseudomonads represent one of the largest assemblies of the denitrifying bacteria within a single genus, favoring their use as model organisms. Around 50 genes are required within a single bacterium to encode the core structures of the denitrification apparatus. Much of the denitrification process of gram-negative bacteria has been found confined to the periplasm, whereas the topology and enzymology of the gram-positive bacteria are less well established. The activation and enzymatic transformation of N oxides is based on the redox chemistry of Fe, Cu, and Mo. Biochemical breakthroughs have included the X-ray structures of the two types of respiratory nitrite reductases and the isolation of the novel enzymes nitric oxide reductase and nitrous oxide reductase, as well as their structural characterization by indirect spectroscopic means. This revealed unexpected relationships among denitrification enzymes and respiratory oxygen reductases. Denitrification is intimately related to fundamental cellular processes that include primary and secondary transport, protein translocation, cytochrome c biogenesis, anaerobic gene regulation, metalloprotein assembly, and the biosynthesis of the cofactors molybdopterin and heme D1. An important class of regulators for the anaerobic expression of the denitrification apparatus are transcription factors of the greater FNR family. Nitrate and nitric oxide, in addition to being respiratory substrates, have been identified as signaling molecules for the induction of distinct N oxide-metabolizing enzymes.

/pdf/cell-biology-and-molecular-basis-of-denitrification-red4l5iffz.pdf

Cell biology and molecular basis of denitrification.

For present purposes, a protein-bound metal site consists of one or more metal ions and all protein side chain and exogenous bridging and terminal ligands that define the first coordination sphere of each metal ion. Such sites can be classified into five basic types with the indicated functions: (1) structural -- configuration (in part) of protein tertiary and/or quaternary structure; (2) storage -- uptake, binding, and release of metals in soluble form: (3) electron transfer -- uptake, release, and storage of electrons; (4) dioxygen binding -- metal-O{sub 2} coordination and decoordination; and (5) catalytic -- substrate binding, activation, and turnover. The authors present here a classification and structure/function analysis of native metal sites based on these functions, where 5 is an extensive class subdivided by the type of reaction catalyzed. Within this purview, coverage of the various site types is extensive, but not exhaustive. The purpose of this exposition is to present examples of all types of sites and to relate, insofar as is currently feasible, the structure and function of selected types. The authors largely confine their considerations to the sites themselves, with due recognition that these site features are coupled to protein structure at all levels. In themore » next section, the coordination chemistry of metalloprotein sites and the unique properties of a protein as a ligand are briefly summarized. Structure/function relationships are systematically explored and tabulations of structurally defined sites presented. Finally, future directions in bioinorganic research in the context of metal site chemistry are considered. 620 refs.« less

/pdf/structural-and-functional-aspects-of-metal-sites-in-biology-a6d65lev8n.pdf

Structural and Functional Aspects of Metal Sites in Biology

Because of the high catalytic activities and substrate specificity, natural enzymes have been widely used in industrial, medical, and biological fields, etc. Although promising, they often suffer from intrinsic shortcomings such as high cost, low operational stability, and difficulties of recycling. To overcome these shortcomings, researchers have been devoted to the exploration of artificial enzyme mimics for a long time. Since the discovery of ferromagnetic nanoparticles with intrinsic horseradish peroxidase-like activity in 2007, a large amount of studies on nanozymes have been constantly emerging in the next decade. Nanozymes are one kind of nanomaterials with enzymatic catalytic properties. Compared with natural enzymes, nanozymes have the advantages such as low cost, high stability and durability, which have been widely used in industrial, medical, and biological fields. A thorough understanding of the possible catalytic mechanisms will contribute to the development of novel and high-efficient nanozymes, and the rational regulations of the activities of nanozymes are of great significance. In this review, we systematically introduce the classification, catalytic mechanism, activity regulation as well as recent research progress of nanozymes in the field of biosensing, environmental protection, and disease treatments, etc. in the past years. We also propose the current challenges of nanozymes as well as their future research focus. We anticipate this review may be of significance for the field to understand the properties of nanozymes and the development of novel nanomaterials with enzyme mimicking activities.

Nanozymes: Classification, Catalytic Mechanisms, Activity Regulation, and Applications

Molybdenum is the only second-row transition metal required by most living organisms, and is nearly universally distributed in biology. Enzymes containing molybdenum in their active sites have long been recognized,1 and at present over 50 molybdenum-containing enzymes have been purified and biochemically characterized; a great many more gene products have been annotated as putative molybdenum-containing proteins on the basis of genomic and bioinformatic analysis.2 In certain cases, our understanding of the relationship between enzyme structure and function is such that we can speak with confidence as to the detailed nature of the reaction mechanism and, with the availability of high-resolution X-ray crystal structures, the specific means by which transition states are stabilized and reaction rate is accelerated within the friendly confines of the active site. At the same time, our understanding of the biosynthesis of the organic cofactor that accompanies molybdenum (variously called molybdopterin or pyranopterin), the manner in which molybdenum is incorporated into it, and then further modified as necessary prior to insertion into apoprotein has also (in at least some cases) become increasingly well understood.

It is now well-established that all molybdenum-containing enzymes other than nitrogenase (in which molybdenum is incorporated into a [MoFe7S9] cluster of the active site) fall into three large and mutually exclusive families, as exemplified by the enzymes xanthine oxidase, sulfite oxidase, and DMSO reductase; these enzymes represent the focus of the present account.3 The structures of the three canonical molybdenum centers in their oxidized Mo(VI) states are shown in Figure 1, along with that for the pyranopterin cofactor. The active sites of members of the xanthine oxidase family have an LMoVIOS-(OH) structure with a square-pyramidal coordination geometry. The apical ligand is a Mo=O ligand, and the equatorial plane has two sulfurs from the enedithiolate side chain of the pyranopterin cofactor, a catalytically labile Mo–OH group, and most frequently a Mo=S. Nonfunctional forms of these enzymes exist in which the equatorial Mo=S is replaced with a second Mo=O; in at least one member of the family the Mo=S is replaced by a Mo=Se, and in others it is replaced by a more complex –S–Cu–S–Cys to give a binuclear center. Members of the sulfite oxidase family have a related LMoVIO2(S–Cys) active site, again square-pyramidal with an apical Mo=O and a bidentate enedithiolate Ligand (L) in the equatorial plane but with a second equatorial Mo=O (rather than Mo–OH) and a cysteine ligand contributed by the protein (rather than a Mo=S) completing the molybdenum coordination sphere. The final family is the most diverse structurally, although all members possess two (rather than just one) equiv of the pyranopterin cofactor and have an L2MoVIY(X) trigonal prismatic coordination geometry. DMSO reductase itself has a catalytically labile Mo=O as Y and a serinate ligand as X completing the metal coordination sphere of oxidized enzyme. Other family members have cysteine (the bacterial Nap periplasmic nitrate reductases), selenocysteine (formate dehydrogenase H), –OH (arsenite oxidase), or aspartate (the NarGHI dissimilatory nitrate reductases) in place of the serine. Some enzymes have S or even Se in place of the Mo=O group. Members of the DMSO reductase family exhibit a general structural homology to members of the aldehyde:ferredoxin oxidoreductase family of tungsten-containing enzymes;4 indeed, the first pyranopterin-containing enzyme to be crystallographically characterized was the tungsten-containing aldehyde:ferredoxin oxidoreductase from Pyrococcus furiosus,5 a fact accounting for why many workers in the field prefer “pyranopterin” (or, perhaps waggishly, “tungstopterin”) to “molybdopterin”. The term pyranopterin will generally be used in the present account.




Open in a separate window


Figure 1


Active site structures for the three families of mononuclear molybdenum enzymes. The structures shown are, from left to right, for xanthine oxidase, sulfite oxidase, and DMSO reductase. The structure of the pyranopterin cofactor common to all of these enzymes (as well as the tungsten-containing enzymes) is given at the bottom.

/pdf/the-mononuclear-molybdenum-enzymes-huemv59go8.pdf

The Mononuclear Molybdenum Enzymes

Physiological and pathophysiological roles of excitatory amino acids during central nervous system development

Isolation and characterization of a second molybdopterin dinucleotide: molybdopterin cytosine dinucleotide.

In vitro reconstitution of demolybdosulfite oxidase by a molybdenum cofactor from rat liver and other sources.

Isolated sulfite oxidase deficiency: review of two cases in one family.

Publisher Summary This chapter discusses the molybdenum cofactor common to nitrate reductase, xanthine dehydrogenase, and sulfite oxidase. Both nitrate reductase and xanthine dehydrogenase share a common molybdenum cofactor, the synthesis of which is controlled by five independent genetic loci. The molybdenum cofactor present in nitrogenase is unique, while the molybdenum containing component of other molybdoenzymes is of a more universal nature as originally hypothesized. Although considerable effort has been applied to the determination of the structural elements of the nitrogenase molybdenum cofactor and of the molybdenum-containing cofactor of other molybdoenzymes, the information presently available is limited. Cofactor sources can be divided into two major categories: those that supply cofactor in a form that can reconstitute demolybdoenzymes directly and those that have latent cofactor activity, as part of an intact molybdenum enzyme. In the latter case, rather drastic pretreatment such as acidification is required to release the cofactor from the donor molybdoenzyme and make it available to the acceptor molecule. One major disadvantage to the use of the various inactive nitrate reductases as substrates for assay of molybdenum cofactor is that the apoenzyme molecules are particularly labile and are rapidly inactivated under many in vitro conditions.

The Molybdenum Cofactor Common to Nitrate Reductase, Xanthine Dehydrogenase and Sulfite Oxidase

Molybdenum cofactor deficiency and isolated sulfite oxidase deficiency are autosomal recessive inborn errors of metabolism with severe neurological symptoms resulting from a lack of sulfite oxidase activity. The deficiencies can be diagnosed prenatally by monitoring sulfite oxidase activity in chorionic villus sampling (CVS) tissue. In those families in which the specific defects have been identified, diagnosis can be achieved by mutation analysis or linkage studies directed at affected genes. These include MOCS1, MOCS2 or GEPH, in cases of molybdenum cofactor deficiency, or SUOX in patients with isolated sulfite oxidase deficiency.

Jean L. Johnson

Papers

Isolation and characterization of a second molybdopterin dinucleotide: molybdopterin cytosine dinucleotide.

In vitro reconstitution of demolybdosulfite oxidase by a molybdenum cofactor from rat liver and other sources.

Isolated sulfite oxidase deficiency: review of two cases in one family.

The Molybdenum Cofactor Common to Nitrate Reductase, Xanthine Dehydrogenase and Sulfite Oxidase

Prenatal diagnosis of molybdenum cofactor deficiency and isolated sulfite oxidase deficiency