Jennifer Price

TL;DR: In this article, a predictive model of pro-environmental agricultural practices, drawing on psychological frameworks: Value-Belief-Norms and Theory of Planned Behaviour, was proposed to predict 52% of the variance in complex behaviour.

TL;DR: This paper found that people with stronger global than national attachments were more likely to attribute climate change to anthropogenic causes, oppose hierarchy-enhancing myths that legitimize climate inaction, and perceive positive economic impacts arising from climate change responses, in comparison to individuals indicating stronger national over global place attachments.

TL;DR: In this article, cultural biases about the environment have the same structure as those about society, which legitimize four ways of life: individualistic and fatalistic perspectives frame the environment as ‘elastic’ to justify damaging behaviors.

TL;DR: This article investigated people's associations with climate change, and their affective content on multiple dimensions, through two studies, and found that a significant proportion of people struggle to form concrete associations, common associations are typically psychologically distant and iconographic, but some national-level impacts are also salient; and associations of climate change impacts differ in their affectives content: Specifically, associations related to drought and denuded landscapes provoke lower arousal, whereas associations with disasters and extremes provoke higher arousal.

TL;DR: This paper investigated how people's perceptions of alternative water sources compare with their perceptions of other technologies, and identified significant predictors of comfort with different alternative water source, including age and gender.