scispace - formally typeset
J

Jeroen van de Ven

Researcher at University of Amsterdam

Publications -  51
Citations -  955

Jeroen van de Ven is an academic researcher from University of Amsterdam. The author has contributed to research in topics: Incentive & Lying. The author has an hindex of 17, co-authored 50 publications receiving 796 citations. Previous affiliations of Jeroen van de Ven include Tinbergen Institute & Utrecht University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Aspiration Level, Probability of Success and Failure, and Expected Utility

TL;DR: This paper developed a model that takes this into account, including the overall probabilities of success and failure, i.e., the probabilities of reaching and not reaching the aspiration level, into an expected utility representation, which turns out to be equivalent, in a mathematical sense, to expected utility with a discontinuous utility function.
Journal ArticleDOI

Aspiration level, probability of success and failure, and expected utility*

TL;DR: This article developed a model that includes the overall probabilities of success and failure relative to the aspiration level into an expected utility representation, which turns out to be equivalent to expected utility with a discontinuous utility function.
Journal ArticleDOI

Promises and cooperation: Evidence from a TV game show

TL;DR: The authors study the role of communication in a high-stakes prisoner's dilemma, using data from a television game show and find that 40% of the players voluntarily promise to cooperate, and these players are 50 percentage points more likely to cooperate than players who do not volunteer a promise.
Journal ArticleDOI

Can Observers Predict Trustworthiness

TL;DR: The authors investigate whether experimental subjects can predict behavior in a prisoner's dilemma played on a TV show and find that subjects correctly predict that women and players who make a voluntary promise are more likely to cooperate.
Journal ArticleDOI

Self-Confidence and Strategic Behavior

TL;DR: In this article, the authors test experimentally an explanation of over and under confidence as motivated by (perhaps unconscious) strategic concerns, and find compelling evidence supporting this hypothesis in the behavior of participants who send and respond to others' statements of confidence about how well they have scored on an IQ test.