scispace - formally typeset
J

Jo Anne Earp

Researcher at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Publications -  114
Citations -  8134

Jo Anne Earp is an academic researcher from University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The author has contributed to research in topics: Health care & Mammography. The author has an hindex of 50, co-authored 114 publications receiving 7496 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Social Ecological Approaches to Individuals and Their Contexts: Twenty Years of Health Education & Behavior Health Promotion Interventions

TL;DR: A coding system was developed to identify the ecological levels that health promotion programs target and then applied to 157 intervention articles, finding that articles were more likely to describe interventions focused on individual and interpersonal characteristics, rather than institutional, community, or policy factors.

Measuring battering: development of the Women's Experience with Battering (WEB) Scale

TL;DR: The approach to measuring battering operationalizes the experiences of battered women rather than the abusive behaviors they encounter, which emphasizes the meanings battered women attach to the violence and to battering as an enduring presence in their lives.
Journal ArticleDOI

The association of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and physician recommendation for mammography: who gets the message about breast cancer screening?

TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the association between physician recomendation for mammography and race/ethnicity, socio-economic status, and other characteristics of the population.
Journal ArticleDOI

Physicians' reactions to uncertainty in patient care. A new measure and new insights.

TL;DR: By virtue of its clarity and good psychometric properties, this new measure promises insights into the role that uncertainty plays in physicians' resource utilization and practice patterns.
Journal ArticleDOI

Written case simulations: do they predict physicians' behavior?

TL;DR: No clear consensus emerged from an examination on the 11 studies on how well responses to written case simulations perform as proxy measures of actual behavior, suggesting more work is needed before assuming that written case simulation measure actual behavior.