scispace - formally typeset
J

Joe D. Luck

Researcher at University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Publications -  8
Citations -  156

Joe D. Luck is an academic researcher from University of Nebraska–Lincoln. The author has contributed to research in topics: Irrigation management & Duty cycle. The author has an hindex of 6, co-authored 8 publications receiving 101 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Droplet size and nozzle tip pressure from a pulse-width modulation sprayer

TL;DR: In this article, a low-speed wind tunnel at the Pesticide Application Technology Laboratory was used to identify the droplet size distribution and nozzle tip pressure when influenced by PWM duty cycle, nozzle technology, and gauge pressure to provide PWM guidelines.
Journal ArticleDOI

Integration of hydrogeophysical datasets and empirical orthogonal functions for improved irrigation water management

TL;DR: In this article, the authors explore the utility of the cosmic-ray neutron probe (CRNP) which measures volumetric soil water content (SWC) in the top 30 cm of the soil profile.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluation of spray pattern uniformity using three unique analyses as impacted by nozzle, pressure, and pulse-width modulation duty cycle

TL;DR: Overall, results suggest PWM duty cycles at or above 40% minimally impact spray pattern uniformity and increased application pressures and the use of non-venturi nozzles on PWM sprayers increase the precision and uniformity of spray applications.
Journal ArticleDOI

A geospatial variable rate irrigation control scenario evaluation methodology based on mining root zone available water capacity

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provide a geospatial method for potential variable rate irrigation (VRI) adopters to evaluate control scenarios and potential water savings using freely available datasets.
Journal ArticleDOI

Response of Amaranthus spp. following exposure to sublethal herbicide rates via spray particle drift.

TL;DR: Plants were moresensitive to glyphosate at higher exposure rates than other herbicides, whereas plants were more sensitive to 2,4-D and dicamba at lower exposure rates compared to glyphosate.