scispace - formally typeset
J

Johannes Breuer

Researcher at Leibniz Association

Publications -  63
Citations -  1873

Johannes Breuer is an academic researcher from Leibniz Association. The author has contributed to research in topics: Video game & Social media. The author has an hindex of 17, co-authored 56 publications receiving 1270 citations. Previous affiliations of Johannes Breuer include University of Cologne & Media Research Center.

Papers
More filters
Journal Article

Why so serious? On the relation of serious games and learning

TL;DR: A more flexible classification system for serious games is developed in order to include commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) games for learning purposes and description options for future developments of gaming technology.
Journal ArticleDOI

A practical guide for transparency in psychological science

TL;DR: A practical guide to help researchers navigate the process of preparing and sharing the products of their research (e.g., choosing a repository, preparing their research products for sharing, structuring folders, etc.).
Journal ArticleDOI

Integrating Survey Data and Digital Trace Data: Key Issues in Developing an Emerging Field:

TL;DR: This special issue addresses challenges by presenting cutting-edge methodological work on how to best collect and analyze linked data as well as studies that have successfully combined survey data and digital trace data to find innovative answers to relevant social scientific questions.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Relationship Between Use of Social Network Sites, Online Social Support, and Well-Being: Results From a Six-Wave Longitudinal Study.

TL;DR: Positive cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships between asking for advice on SNS and online social support are found, indicating that SNS can be an effective tool for receiving social support.
Journal ArticleDOI

Press CRTT to measure aggressive behavior: The unstandardized use of the competitive reaction time task in aggression research.

TL;DR: Compared analyses of the competitive reaction time task revealed large differences in significance levels and effect sizes between analysis procedures, suggesting that the unstandardized use and analysis of the CRTT have substantial impacts on the results obtained, as well as their interpretations.