scispace - formally typeset
J

Johannes Fürnkranz

Researcher at Johannes Kepler University of Linz

Publications -  290
Citations -  9241

Johannes Fürnkranz is an academic researcher from Johannes Kepler University of Linz. The author has contributed to research in topics: Pairwise comparison & Heuristics. The author has an hindex of 43, co-authored 279 publications receiving 8340 citations. Previous affiliations of Johannes Fürnkranz include University of Vienna & Austrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Multilabel classification via calibrated label ranking

TL;DR: This work proposes a suitable extension of label ranking that incorporates the calibrated scenario and substantially extends the expressive power of existing approaches and suggests a conceptually novel technique for extending the common learning by pairwise comparison approach to the multilabel scenario, a setting previously not being amenable to the pairwise decomposition technique.
Journal ArticleDOI

Separate-and-Conquer Rule Learning

TL;DR: This paper is a survey of inductive rule learning algorithms that use a separate-and-conquer strategy and analyzes them along three different dimensions, namely their search, language and overfitting avoidance biases.
Journal ArticleDOI

Label ranking by learning pairwise preferences

TL;DR: This work shows that a simple (weighted) voting strategy minimizes risk with respect to the well-known Spearman rank correlation and compares RPC to existing label ranking methods, which are based on scoring individual labels instead of comparing pairs of labels.
Journal ArticleDOI

Round robin classification

TL;DR: An empirical evaluation of round robin classification, implemented as a wrapper around the Ripper rule learning algorithm, on 20 multi-class datasets from the UCI database repository shows that the technique is very likely to improve Ripper's classification accuracy without having a high risk of decreasing it.
Book ChapterDOI

Incremental reduced error pruning

TL;DR: Experiments show that in many noisy domains this method is much more efficient than alternative algorithms, along with a slight gain in accuracy, however, the experiments show that the use of the algorithm cannot be recommended for domains which require a very specific concept description.