scispace - formally typeset
J

John B. Brunski

Researcher at Stanford University

Publications -  98
Citations -  4619

John B. Brunski is an academic researcher from Stanford University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Osseointegration & Implant. The author has an hindex of 30, co-authored 93 publications receiving 4127 citations. Previous affiliations of John B. Brunski include Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

In vivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone/dental-implant interface.

TL;DR: Data support the hypothesis that interfacial overload occurs if the strains are excessive in interfacial bone, and researchers may sometimes be too willing to accept this paradigm as an exclusive explanation of in vivo tissue responses during experiments.
Journal Article

Biomaterials and biomechanics of oral and maxillofacial implants: current status and future developments.

TL;DR: Research in biomaterials and biomechanics has fueled a large part of the significant revolution associated with osseointegrated implants; however, several important questions still remain, and much of what is done now by clinicians remains empirical.
Journal ArticleDOI

Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interface.

TL;DR: Recent research suggests that the search for a more detailed hypothesis regarding the relationship between interface mechanics and biology should take account of basic bone physiology, e.g. wound healing after implantation plus basic processes of bone modeling and remodeling.
Journal ArticleDOI

Nanoscale surface modifications of medically relevant metals: state-of-the art and perspectives

TL;DR: This review presents and discusses the state-of-the-art of nanotechnology-based approaches currently adopted to modify the surface of metals used for orthopedic and dental applications, and briefly considers their use in the cardiovascular field.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Influence of Functional Use of Endosseous Dental Implants on the Tissue-implant Interface. II. Clinical Aspects

TL;DR: Functional and non-functional endosseous dental implants were clinically compared in beagle mandibles for up to one year post-operatively to reveal detailed histological differences between implant-tissue interfaces of functional andnon-functional implants.