J
John Drury
Researcher at University of Sussex
Publications - 187
Citations - 11227
John Drury is an academic researcher from University of Sussex. The author has contributed to research in topics: Social identity theory & Identity (social science). The author has an hindex of 41, co-authored 169 publications receiving 8063 citations. Previous affiliations of John Drury include University of Central Lancashire.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Social identification moderates the effect of crowd density on safety at the Hajj
Hani Alnabulsi,John Drury +1 more
TL;DR: A large-scale survey of pilgrims on the Hajj to Mecca showed that where there is identification with the crowd the negative effect of crowd density on safety is diminished or even reversed: a new finding.
Journal ArticleDOI
Pandemic fatigue? How adherence to covid-19 regulations has been misrepresented and why it matters.
Stephen Reicher,John Drury +1 more
Journal ArticleDOI
Facilitating Collective Psychosocial Resilience in the Public in Emergencies: Twelve Recommendations Based on the Social Identity Approach.
John Drury,Holly Carter,Christopher Cocking,Evangelos Ntontis,Evangelos Ntontis,Selin Tekin Guven,Richard Amlôt +6 more
TL;DR: This review will suggest that the “community resilience” agenda has only been partly realized in practice, but that the social identity approach is progressing this, and derive from the research literature and from dialogue with groups involved in emergencies a set of 12 recommendations for both emergency managers and members of the public affected by emergencies.
Journal ArticleDOI
Modelling subgroup behaviour in crowd dynamics DEM simulation
TL;DR: In this article, an existing crowd modelling program, CrowdDMX, based on a discrete element model (DEM) has been modified on the basis of observations made in this paper and literature.
Journal ArticleDOI
Knowledge-based public order policing: Principles and practice
Stephen Reicher,Clifford Stott,John Drury,Otto M. J. Adang,Patrick D. J. Cronin,Andrew G. Livingstone +5 more
TL;DR: The authors argue that much public order policing is still based on the assumption that crowds are inherently irrational and dangerous, which can lead to policing interventions that increase the influence of those advocating violence in the crowd.