New evidence and consensus has led to further revision of the McDonald Criteria for diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. The use of imaging for demonstration of dissemination of central nervous system lesions in space and time has been simplified, and in some circumstances dissemination in space and time can be established by a single scan. These revisions simplify the Criteria, preserve their diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, address their applicability across populations, and may allow earlier diagnosis and more uniform and widespread use.

/pdf/diagnostic-criteria-for-multiple-sclerosis-2010-revisions-to-24iph50480.pdf

Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 Revisions to the McDonald criteria

The International Panel on MS Diagnosis presents revised diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS). The focus remains on the objective demonstration of dissemination of lesions in both time and space. Magnetic resonance imaging is integrated with dinical and other paraclinical diagnostic methods. The revised criteria facilitate the diagnosis of MS in patients with a variety of presentations, including "monosymptomatic" disease suggestive of MS, disease with a typical relapsing-remitting course, and disease with insidious progression, without clear attacks and remissions. Previously used terms such as "clinically definite" and "probable MS" are no longer recommended. The outcome of a diagnostic evaluation is either MS, "possible MS" (for those at risk for MS, but for whom diagnostic evaluation is equivocal), or "not MS."

https://www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ana.1032

Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines from the International Panel on the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis

A serum autoantibody marker of neuromyelitis optica : distinction from multiple sclerosis

Background: The authors previously proposed diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica (NMO) that facilitate its distinction from prototypic multiple sclerosis (MS) However, some patients with otherwise typical NMO have additional symptoms not attributable to optic nerve or spinal cord inflammation or have MS-like brain MRI lesions Furthermore, some patients are misclassified as NMO by the authors’ earlier proposed criteria despite having a subsequent course indistinguishable from prototypic MS A serum autoantibody marker, NMO-IgG, is highly specific for NMO The authors propose revised NMO diagnostic criteria that incorporate NMO-IgG status Methods: Using final clinical diagnosis (NMO or MS) as the reference standard, the authors calculated sensitivity and specificity for each criterion and various combinations using a sample of 96 patients with NMO and 33 with MS The authors used likelihood ratios and logistic regression analysis to develop the most practical and informative diagnostic model Results: Fourteen patients with NMO (146%) had extra-optic-spinal CNS symptoms NMO-IgG seropositivity was 76% sensitive and 94% specific for NMO The best diagnostic combination was 99% sensitive and 90% specific for NMO and consisted of at least two of three elements: longitudinally extensive cord lesion, onset brain MRI nondiagnostic for MS, or NMO-IgG seropositivity Conclusions: The authors propose revised diagnostic criteria for definite neuromyelitis optica (NMO) that require optic neuritis, myelitis, and at least two of three supportive criteria: MRI evidence of a contiguous spinal cord lesion 3 or more segments in length, onset brain MRI nondiagnostic for multiple sclerosis, or NMO-IgG seropositivity CNS involvement beyond the optic nerves and spinal cord is compatible with NMO

https://n.neurology.org/content/neurology/66/10/1485.full.pdf

Revised diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica

Objectives: To evaluate the spectrum of neuromyelitis optica (NMO), including characteristics of the index events (optic neuritis [ON]) and myelitis), neuroimaging, CSF, and serologic studies, and to evaluate the long-term course. Methods: Review of 71 patients with NMO evaluated at the Mayo Clinic between 1950 and 1997. Results: NMO was either monophasic or relapsing. Patients with a monophasic course (n = 23) usually presented with rapidly sequential index events (median 5 days) with moderate recovery. Most with a relapsing course (n = 48) had an extended interval between index events (median 166 days) followed within 3 years by clusters of severe relapses isolated to the optic nerves and spinal cord. Most relapsing patients developed severe disability in a stepwise manner, and one-third died because of respiratory failure. Features of NMO distinct from “typical” MS included >50 cells/mm 3 in CSF (often polymorphonuclear), normal initial brain MRI, and lesions extending over three or more vertebral segments on spinal cord MRI. Conclusions: Clinical, laboratory, and imaging features generally distinguish neuromyelitis optica from MS. Patients with relapsing optic neuritis and myelitis may have neuromyelitis optica rather than MS. Patients with a relapsing course of neuromyelitis optica have a poor prognosis and frequently develop respiratory failure during attacks of cervical myelitis.

The clinical course of neuromyelitis optica (Devic's syndrome)

We compared the diagnostic capabilities of MRI to CT, evoked potentials (EP), and CSF oligoclonal banding analysis in a prospective evaluation of 200 patients with suspected multiple sclerosis (MS). MRI was the best method for demonstrating dissemination in space. An abnormal appropriate EP in monosymptomatic disease was usually supported by MRI and CSF anaylsis as being predictive of MS as a clinical diagnosis. A normal appropriate EP study was not satisfactory because MRI and CSF analysis often did not support a diagnosis of non-MS . When there is agreement between three of these paraclinical studies, the diagnosis of MS is probably unequivocal. For use in research studies, laboratory-supported definite MS (LSDMS) could be diagnosed in 85 patients of the total 200 (42.5%), in 19/38 (50%) of optic neuritis (ON) patients, and in 24/52 (46%) of chronic progressive myelopathy (CPM) patients. MRI was 100% successful in identifying patients who qualified for LSDMS in the ON and CPM groups. In a short follow-up (less than 1 year), 19/200 (10%) went on to develop clinically definite MS (CDMS), and MRI predicted that diagnosis in 18/19 (95%). Only long-term follow-up will show how well these studies and the category of LSDMS predict the development of CDMS. The clinical diagnosis of MS (CDMS), even though only 95% accurate, must remain the gold standard.

MRI in the diagnosis of MS A prospective study with comparison of clinical evaluation, evoked potentials, oligoclonal banding, and CT

The objective of the present study were (1) to ascertain the lifetime risk of a depression in a representative group of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, (2) to assess the morbidity risks for depression among first-degree relatives of these MS patients, and (3) to compare these familial risks for first-degree relatives of MS patients with those for first-degree relatives of a primary depression population, i.e., depression but no MS. We psychiatrically evaluated 221 MS patients (index cases) using a structured clinical interview for the DSM-III-R and calculated the rate and lifetime risk of depression for these index cases using the product limit estimate of survival function. We obtained psychiatric histories for all first-degree relatives of index cases, and we calculated morbidity risks for depression for these relatives using the maximum likelihood approach and compared the risks using the likelihood ratio tests. Index cases had a 50.3% lifetime risk of depression. Morbidity risks for depression among first-degree relatives of index cases were decidedly lower when compared with morbidity risks among first-degree relatives of the reference population. Although there appears to be a very high rate of depression among MS patients, the data for their first-degree relatives do not support a clear genetic basis for this depression, or at least the same genetic basis that probably operates within families when depression occurs in the absence of MS.

Depression and multiple sclerosis

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) occurred in 35 patients (1.9%) from a large multiple sclerosis (MS) clinic population (N = 1,882). TN began on average 11.8 years after the first MS symptom but in five patients was the first symptom of MS, preceding the next MS symptom by 1 to 11 years. The onset of MS was later in the patients who had TN, and bilateral TN occurred more frequently than expected (in 14% of TN patients). The age at onset of TN was no younger than in idiopathic TN except when TN was the first MS symptom. Most patients had a good result from medical or surgical therapy.

Trigeminal neuralgia in multiple sclerosis

We previously compared the diagnostic capabilities of MRI of the head with CT, evoked potentials, and CSF oligoclonal banding (OB) analysis in a prospective evaluation of 200 patients with suspected multiple sclerosis (MS). To examine the ability of MRI and other paraclinical tests to predict the diagnosis of clinically definite MS (CDMS), we did a systematic clinical follow‐up of 200 patients who were previously reported. In that study, 85 of 200 could be diagnosed as having laboratory‐supported definite MS (LSDMS). In follow‐up, we excluded one patient diagnosed as LSDMS who in retrospect was considered to have had CDMS at entry and 15 patients who were eventually diagnosed as having other diseases. After a mean follow‐up of 2.1 years, 55 of the remaining 184 patients (30%) had developed CDMS. Thirty‐eight of 84 patients with an original diagnosis of LSDMS (45%) and 17 of the remaining 100 patients with suspected MS (17%) had become CDMS. Forty‐six of the 55 patients who developed CDMS in follow‐up (84%) had an initial MRI that was strongly suggestive of MS. Fifty‐two of those 55 CDMS patients (95%) had at least one MS‐like abnormality on MRI when originally studied. In contrast, 38 of 55 (69%) had CSF OB, 38 of 55 (69%) had an abnormal VEP, 35 of 55 (64%) had an abnormal SEP, and 21 of 55 (38%) had an abnormal CT when first studied. MRI was the most sensitive single paraclinical test for predicting CDMS. CDMS developed during follow‐up in 46 of the 94 patients (49%) whose initial MRI was strongly suggestive of MS. These follow‐up results confirm our previous observation that MRI is the best paraclinical test for detecting asymptomatic dissemination in space and for predicting the diagnosis of CDMS. NEUROLOGY 1991;41:657‐660

Magnetic resonance imaging of the head in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: A prospective 2‐year follow‐up with comparison of clinical evaluation, evoked potentials, oligoclonal banding, and CT

Objective: To conduct a prospective assessment of pregnancy on women with multiple sclerosis (MS), focusing on pregnancy outcome and relapses during gestation and up to 6 months after delivery. Design: Expected numbers of relapses were based on data for (1) "self-controls": the mothers ("cases") themselves prior to becoming pregnant and (2) "matched controls": female patients with MS "matched" to the mothers for year of birth, age of MS onset, MS type, MS course, and initial MS symptom(s). Setting: Cases and controls were identified from an ambulatory care MS clinic that serves the province of British Columbia, Canada. Patients or Other Participants: Women with a diagnosis of MS who attended the MS clinic during 1982 through 1986 and subsequently became pregnant during 1982 through 1989 inclusive were included in this study as cases. Matched controls were women with MS who attended the MS clinic during the same period but did not become pregnant. Results: No significant increase in relapse rate was found for cases during the first two trimesters of gestation. The number of relapses was significantly less than expected during the third trimester compared with matched controls (ϰ2=6.80,df=1,P .05). The observed number of relapses for the 6 months after delivery did not differ significantly from expected (self-controls:ϰ2=2.84,df=2,P>.05; matched controls: ϰ2=1.76,df=2,P>.05). Conclusion: These data suggest that neither pregnancy nor the 6-month period after delivery is a risk factor for relapse in MS. They are consistent with previous observations that, in the long term, pregnancy does not influence subsequent MS disability.

https://jamanetwork.com/HttpHandlers/ArticlePdfHandler.ashx?journal=neur&articleId=593141&pdfFileName=archneur_51_11_013.pdf

John P. Hooge

Papers

MRI in the diagnosis of MS A prospective study with comparison of clinical evaluation, evoked potentials, oligoclonal banding, and CT

Depression and multiple sclerosis

Trigeminal neuralgia in multiple sclerosis

Magnetic resonance imaging of the head in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: A prospective 2‐year follow‐up with comparison of clinical evaluation, evoked potentials, oligoclonal banding, and CT

Pregnancy and Multiple Sclerosis: A Prospective Study