scispace - formally typeset
J

John Randal

Researcher at Victoria University of Wellington

Publications -  22
Citations -  323

John Randal is an academic researcher from Victoria University of Wellington. The author has contributed to research in topics: Estimator & Volatility (finance). The author has an hindex of 7, co-authored 19 publications receiving 285 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

How is donation behaviour affected by the donations of others

TL;DR: This paper describes a natural field experiment investigating voluntary contributions to a public good in an art gallery where admission was free, but donations could be deposited into a transparent box in the foyer by altering what was visible in the donation box.
Journal ArticleDOI

How Sunday, price, and social norms influence donation behaviour

TL;DR: A natural field experiment investigating donation behaviour in an art gallery where donations could be deposited into a transparent box in the foyer manipulated two aspects of the donation environment: signs on the donation box and the initial contents of the box.
Journal ArticleDOI

Ethics and experiments in accounting: A contribution to the debate on measuring ethical behaviour

TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigate relationships between claimed behaviour in a questionnaire and actual behaviour in an experimental environment, together with different behaviours between males and females, and different age cohorts.
Journal ArticleDOI

A reinvestigation of robust scale estimation in finite samples

TL;DR: This paper reworks and expands on the results of existing simulation studies, investigating the performance of various robust estimators of scale for Tukey's three corner distributions, and proposes a new estimator based on the Student's t-distribution, which attains an efficiency close to that of the A-estimator.
Posted Content

Voluntary contributions to a public good: A natural field experiment

TL;DR: The results of a natural field experiment that investigated voluntary contributions to a public good as mentioned in this paper showed that the manipulation of social information had a statistically significant impact on donation composition, the propensity to donate, and the amount donated.