scispace - formally typeset
J

Joianne L. Shortz

Researcher at Virginia Commonwealth University

Publications -  5
Citations -  183

Joianne L. Shortz is an academic researcher from Virginia Commonwealth University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Early childhood & Scholarship. The author has an hindex of 5, co-authored 5 publications receiving 181 citations. Previous affiliations of Joianne L. Shortz include University of Rochester.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Deviant Sexual Behavior in Children and Young Adolescents: Frequency and Patterns

TL;DR: In this article, a descriptive statistical study was performed to assess the characteristics of youth who began committing sexual offenses in childhood, and the results suggested that deviant sexual behavior may begin in early childhood, with some offenders developing patterns of offending prior to the onset of adolescence.
Journal ArticleDOI

Young adults' recall of religiosity, attributions, and coping in parental divorce.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors analyse la place of la religion a travers le phenomene du stress and analyse the role of attributions causales in the maniere of stress.
Journal ArticleDOI

Can Couples Assessment and Feedback Improve Relationships? Assessment as a Brief Relationship Enrichment Procedure

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated the effects of individualized relationship assessment and feedback in relation to merely completing written questionnaires about the relationships on couples' satisfaction and commitment, and concluded that assessment-feedback couples improved more over time than did written-assessment-only couples.
Journal ArticleDOI

Published scholarship on marital therapy

TL;DR: This article is a content analysis of 10 prominent marital and family therapy journals during a 6-year period to survey the field and facilitate future scholarship.
Journal ArticleDOI

Is there more to counting than what meets the eye? comment on snyder and rice

TL;DR: This paper argued that the results obtained from Snyder and Rice's suggested methodologies are neither appreciably different from the original results nor significantly different from their original results. But they also argued that their suggested methods emphasize a different research question that our original question, we investigated productivity of authous and institutions, not im-pact of scholars on the fiels of marital therapy.