Evolution, challenges and path forward for low temperature combustion engines

RCCI (reactivity controlled compression ignition) engines are found to be capable of achieving higher thermal efficiency and ultra-low NOx and PM emissions. The reactivity controlled combustion is accomplished by creating reactivity stratification in the cylinder with the use of two fuels characterized by distinctly different cetane numbers. The low reactivity (i.e., low cetane number) fuel is firstly premixed with air and then charged into the cylinder through the intake manifold; later, the high reactivity (i.e., high cetane number) fuel is injected into the charged mixture through a direct injector. Subsequently, the reactivity stratification is formed. By strategically adjusting the ratio of two fuels and injection timings, the produced reactivity gradient is able to control the combustion phasing and mitigate the pressure rise rate, as well as the heat release rate. Alternatively, structural factors such as CR (compression ratio) and piston bowl geometries can also affect the combustion characteristics of RCCI. Besides the engine management, the fuels that could be utilized in RCCI engines are also crucial to determine the evaporation, mixing, and combustion processes. To gain a comprehensive knowledge on the state-of-the-art of RCCI combustion, detailed review on the management of RCCI engines has been presented in this paper. This review covers the up-to-date research progress of RCCI including the use of alternative fuels and cetane number improvers, and the effects of fuel ratio, different injection strategies, EGR rate, CR and bowl geometry on engine performance and emissions formation. Moreover, the controllability issues are addressed in this article.

Review on the management of RCCI engines

https://pure.tue.nl/ws/files/98945355/bootimpa2017.pdf

Impact of fuel molecular structure on auto-ignition behavior – Design rules for future high performance gasolines

Selection Criteria and Screening of Potential Biomass-Derived Streams as Fuel Blendstocks for Advanced Spark-Ignition Engines

Several high octane number oxygenates that could be derived from biomass were blended with gasoline and examined for performance properties and their impact on knock resistance and fine particle emissions in a single cylinder direct-injection spark-ignition engine. The oxygenates included ethanol, isobutanol, anisole, 4-methylanisole, 2-phenylethanol, 2,5-dimethyl furan, and 2,4-xylenol. These were blended into a summertime blendstock for oxygenate blending at levels ranging from 10 to 50 percent by volume. The base gasoline, its blends with p-xylene and p-cymene, and high-octane racing gasoline were tested as controls. Relevant gasoline properties including research octane number (RON), motor octane number, distillation curve, and vapor pressure were measured. Detailed hydrocarbon analysis was used to estimate heat of vaporization and particulate matter index (PMI). Experiments were conducted to measure knock-limited spark advance and particulate matter (PM) emissions. The results show a range of knock resistances that correlate well with RON. Molecules with relatively low boiling point and high vapor pressure had little effect on PM emissions. In contrast, the aromatic oxygenates caused significant increases in PM emissions (factors of 2 to 5) relative to the base gasoline. Thus, any effect of their oxygen atom on increasing local air-fuel ratio was outweighed by their low vapor pressure and high double-bond equivalent values. For most fuels and oxygenate blend components, PMI was a good predictor of PM emissions. However, the high boiling point, low vapor pressure oxygenates 2-phenylethanol and 2,4-xylenol produced lower PM emissions than predicted by PMI. This was likely because they did not fully evaporate and combust, and instead were swept into the lube oil. CITATION: Ratcliff, M., Burton, J., Sindler, P., Christensen, E. et al., \"Knock Resistance and Fine Particle Emissions for Several BiomassDerived Oxygenates in a Direct-Injection Spark-Ignition Engine,\" SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 9(1):2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-0705. 2016-01-0705 Published 04/05/2016 Copyright © 2016 SAE International doi:10.4271/2016-01-0705 saefuel.saejournals.org 59 NREL/CP-5400-65398. Posted with permission. Presented at the SAE 2016 World Congress & Exhibition, 12-14 April 2016, Detroit, Michigan.

/pdf/knock-resistance-and-fine-particle-emissions-for-several-ibdjvbqx0s.pdf

Knock Resistance and Fine Particle Emissions for Several Biomass-Derived Oxygenates in a Direct-Injection Spark-Ignition Engine

Impact of ethanol blending into gasoline on aromatic compound evaporation and particle emissions from a gasoline direct injection engine

Investigation of Transient Emissions and Mixed Mode Combustion for a Light Duty Diesel Engine

Knock-limited loads for a set of surrogate gasolines all having nominal 100 research octane number (RON), approximately 11 octane sensitivity (S), and a heat of vaporization (HOV) range of 390 to 595 kJ/kg at 25°C were investigated. A single-cylinder spark-ignition engine derived from a General Motors Ecotec direct injection (DI) engine was used to perform load sweeps at a fixed intake air temperature (IAT) of 50 °C, as well as knock-limited load measurements across a range of IATs up to 90 °C. Both DI and pre-vaporized fuel (supplied by a fuel injector mounted far upstream of the intake valves and heated intake runner walls) experiments were performed to separate the chemical and thermal effects of the fuels’ knock resistance. The DI load sweeps at 50°C intake air temperature showed no effect of HOV on the knocklimited performance. The data suggest that HOV acts as a thermal contributor to S under the conditions studied. Measurement of knock-limited loads from the IAT sweeps for DI at late combustion phasing showed that a 40 vol% ethanol (E40) blend provided additional knock resistance at the highest temperatures, compared to a 20 vol% ethanol blend and hydrocarbon fuel with similar RON and S. Using the prevaporized fuel system, all the high S fuels produced nearly identical knock-limited loads at each temperature across the range of IATs studied. For these fuels RON ranged from 99.2 to 101.1 and S ranged from 9.4 to 12.2, with E40 having the lowest RON and highest S. The higher knock-limited loads for E40 at the highest IATs examined were consistent with the slightly higher S for this fuel, and the lower engine operating condition K values arising from use of this fuel. The study highlights how fuel HOV can affect the temperature at intake valve closing, and consequently the pressure-temperature history of the end gas leading to more negative values of K, thereby enhancing the effect of S on knock resistance.

/pdf/effects-of-heat-of-vaporization-and-octane-sensitivity-on-1txpmpwcih.pdf

Effects of Heat of Vaporization and Octane Sensitivity on Knock-Limited Spark Ignition Engine Performance

Experiments were conducted with ultra low sulfur diesel (ULSD) and 20% biodiesel blends (B20) to compare lube oil dilution levels and lubricant properties for systems using late in-cylinder fuel injection for aftertreatment regeneration. Lube oil dilution was measured by gas chromatography (GC) following ASTM method D3524 to measure diesel content, by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometry following a modified ASTM method D7371 to measure biodiesel content, and by a newly developed back-flush GC method that simultaneously measures both diesel and biodiesel. Heavy-duty (HD) engine testing was conducted on a 2008 6.7L Cummins ISB equipped with a diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC) and diesel particle filter (DPF). Stage one of engine testing consisted of 10 consecutive repeats of a forced DPF regeneration event. This continuous operation with late in-cylinder fuel injection served as a method to accelerate lube-oil dilution. Stage two consisted of 16 hours of normal engine operation over a transient test cycle, which created an opportunity for any accumulated fuel in the oil sump to evaporate. Light duty (LD) vehicle testing was conducted on a 2010 VW Jetta equipped with DOC, DPF and a NOx storage catalyst (NSC). Vehicle testing comprised approximately 4,000 miles of operation on a mileage-accumulation dynamometermore » (MAD) using the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Highway Fuel Economy Cycle because of the relatively low engine oil and exhaust temperatures, and high DPF regeneration frequency of this cycle relative to other cycles examined. Comparison of the lube oil dilution analysis methods suggests that D3524 does not measure dilution by biodiesel. The new back-flush GC method provided analysis for both diesel and biodiesel, in a shorter time and with lower detection limit. Thus all lube oil dilution results in this paper are based on this method. Analysis of the HD lube-oil samples showed only 1.5% to 1.6% fuel dilution for both fuels during continuous operation under DPF regeneration events. During the second stage of HD testing, the ULSD lube-oil dilution levels fell from 1.5% to 0.8%, while for B20, lube-oil dilution levels fell from 1.6% to 1.0%, but the fuel in the oil was 36% biodiesel. For the LD vehicle tests, the frequency of DPF regeneration events was observed to be the same for both ULSD and B20. No significant difference between the two fuels' estimated soot loading was detected by the engine control unit (ECU), although a 23% slower rate of increase in differential pressure across DPF was observed with B20. It appears that the ECU estimated soot loading is based on the engine map, not taking advantage of the lower engine-out particulate matter from the use of biodiesel. After 4,000 miles of LD vehicle operation with ULSD, fuel dilution in the lube-oil samples showed total dilution levels of 4.1% diesel. After 4,000 miles of operation with B20, total fuel in oil dilution levels were 6.7% consisting of 3.6% diesel fuel and 3.1% biodiesel. Extrapolation to the 10,000-mile oil drain interval with B20 suggests that the total fuel content in the oil could reach 12%, compared to 5% for operation on ULSD. Analysis of the oil samples also included measurement of total acid number, total base number, viscosity, soot, metals and wear scar; however, little difference in these parameters was noted.« less

Jonathan Burton

Papers

Knock Resistance and Fine Particle Emissions for Several Biomass-Derived Oxygenates in a Direct-Injection Spark-Ignition Engine

Impact of ethanol blending into gasoline on aromatic compound evaporation and particle emissions from a gasoline direct injection engine

Investigation of Transient Emissions and Mixed Mode Combustion for a Light Duty Diesel Engine

Effects of Heat of Vaporization and Octane Sensitivity on Knock-Limited Spark Ignition Engine Performance

Biodiesel Impact on Engine Lubricant Dilution During Active Regeneration of Aftertreatment Systems