J
Joon Mahn Lee
Researcher at Purdue University
Publications - 24
Citations - 751
Joon Mahn Lee is an academic researcher from Purdue University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Corporate governance & Overconfidence effect. The author has an hindex of 8, co-authored 22 publications receiving 466 citations. Previous affiliations of Joon Mahn Lee include Naver Corporation & Korea University.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Coordinating and competing in ecosystems: How organizational forms shape new technology investments
Rahul Kapoor,Joon Mahn Lee +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine how hospitals' decisions to invest in new imaging technologies are shaped by their governance modes with physicians and with managed care organizations (MCOs), primary distributors of hospital and physician services.
Journal ArticleDOI
Are founder CEOs more overconfident than professional CEOs? Evidence from S&P 1500 companies
TL;DR: The authors found that founder CEOs are more overconfident than professional CEOs and are also more likely to perceive their firms to be undervalued, as implied by their option-exercise behavior.
Patent
Method and system for providing character having game item functions
TL;DR: In this article, a character service method and system having a game item function is described, and a method is provided for generating a character by a character generating system including a gamvatar provider, game server, and avatar.
Journal ArticleDOI
CEO career horizon, corporate governance, and real options: The role of economic short-termism
TL;DR: This study is the first to theoretically explain and empirically show that a CEO's self‐seeking behavior will impact real options investments, and finds strong evidence that aCEO's expected tenure in the firm is positively related to the real option investments at the firm level.
Journal ArticleDOI
Are Founder CEOs more Overconfident than Professional CEOs? Evidence from S&P 1500 Companies
TL;DR: There is evidence that founder CEOs of large SP firms are more likely to perceive their firm to be undervalued as implied by their option-exercise behavior.