Joseph Galaskiewicz

TL;DR: The central argument of network research is that actors are embedded in networks of interconnected social relationships that offer opportunities for and constraints on behavior as discussed by the authors, and the authors of this paper review the antecedents and consequences of networks at the interpersonal, interunit, and interorganizational levels of analysis, evaluate recent theoretical and empirical trends, and give directions for future research.

TL;DR: This article found that managers are especially likely to mimic the behavior of organizations to which they have some type of network tie via boundary-spanning personnel, and also found that a nonprofit is likely to receive more money from a corporation that previously gave money to nonprofits whose directors sit on the nonprofit's board.

TL;DR: Galaskiewicz and Wasserman as discussed by the authors presented a review of the social and behavioral sciences from social network analysis and applied it in the field of computer-mediated communication systems (CMSs).

TL;DR: Kalleberg et al. as discussed by the authors examined whether public sector organizations, when compared to organizations in the business and nonprofit sectors, are more or less as susceptible to mimetic, normative, and coercive pressures.

TL;DR: Crosscutting social circles as mentioned in this paper describes a theory of groups' relations to each other, and tests the theory in the 125 largest metropolitan areas In the United States, where the focus is on the Influence social structure exerts on intergroup relations.