scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

The Maturation of a Macrostructural Theory of Intergroup Relations@@@Crosscutting Social Circles: Testing a Macrostructural Theory of Intergroup Relations.

Joseph Galaskiewicz, +2 more
- 01 Jan 1986 - 
- Vol. 15, Iss: 1, pp 12
TLDR
Crosscutting social circles as mentioned in this paper describes a theory of groups' relations to each other, and tests the theory in the 125 largest metropolitan areas In the United States, where the focus is on the Influence social structure exerts on intergroup relations.
Abstract
Crosscutting Social Circles describes a theory of groups' relations to each other, and tests the theory in the 125 largest metropolitan areas In the United States. The focus is on the Influence social structure exerts on intergroup relations. Blau and Schwartz show how role relations are influenced by how people are distributed among social positions. Examples are a community's racial composition, division of labor, ethnic heterogeneity, income Inequality, or the extent to which educational differences are related to income differences. Blau and Schwartz test their theory by considering its impact on such structural conditions as intermarriage, an important form of intergroup relations. The authors derive the main principles of previously formulated theories of intergroup relations and present them in simpler and clearer form. They empirically test the power of the theory by analyzing its ability to predict how social structure affects intermarriage in the largest American cities, where three-fifths of the American population live. They selected cities because population distribution of a small neighborhood might be affected by casual associations among neighbors; it is much more sociologically interesting if population distribution also affects mate selection in a city of millions. Unlike most theories that emphasize the implications of such cultural orientations as shared values and common norms, this volume focuses on the significance of various forms of inequality and heterogeneity. As one of the few books that supplies a large-scale empirical test of implications of a theory, Crosscutting Social Circles serves as a model. The new introduction by Peter Blau reviews the origins and impact of the book. It will be of immense value to sociologists, psychologists, and group relations specialists.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors evaluated six potential explanations of why different types of ties provide different kinds of supportive resources: tie strength, contact, group processes, kinship, network members' characteristics, and similarities and dissimilarities between network members in such characteristics.
Journal ArticleDOI

Embeddedness in the making of financial capital : How social relations and networks benefit firms seeking financing

TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated how social embeddedness affects an organization's acquisition and cost of financial capital in middle-market banking and developed a framework to explain how embeddedness can influence which firms get capital and at what cost.
Journal ArticleDOI

Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation

TL;DR: The authors examined the influence of influential individuals in the formation of public opinion and found that large cascades of influence are driven not by influential individuals but by a critical mass of easily influenced individuals.
Journal ArticleDOI

Intermarriage and Homogamy: Causes, Patterns, Trends

TL;DR: "Although many characteristics play a role in the choice of a spouse, sociologists have most often examined endogamy and homogamy with respect to race/ ethnicity, religion, and socioeconomic status."
Journal ArticleDOI

Core Discussion Networks of Americans

TL;DR: This article examined aspects of interpersonal networks in which Americans discuss "important matters" using data from the 1985 General Social Survey and found that the networks are small, kin-centered, relatively dense, and homogeneous in comparison with the sample of respondents.