J
Joseph Teal
Researcher at University of Huddersfield
Publications - 4
Citations - 16
Joseph Teal is an academic researcher from University of Huddersfield. The author has contributed to research in topics: Veil of ignorance & Morality. The author has an hindex of 1, co-authored 3 publications receiving 3 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Moral Decision Making: From Bentham to Veil of Ignorance via Perspective Taking Accessibility
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explored the theoretical and methodological development of utilitarian theories of moral decision-making and proposed Perspective-Taking Accessibility (PT accessibility), a new type of veil of ignorance with even odds that do not trigger self-interest, risk related preferences or decision biases.
Journal ArticleDOI
Problem Gambling 'Fuelled on the Fly'.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors explored problem gambling behavior and its psychological determinants and concluded that gamblers anchor on the most recent event, typically a small loss or rare win, which alters the psychological representations of substantial and accumulated loss in the past to a representation of negligible loss.
Journal ArticleDOI
How false feedback influences decision‐makers' risk preferences
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors explore the lability of human risk preferences and argue that the most recent choices guide decision-making and provide a psychological tool that measures people's shift in preferences.
Journal ArticleDOI
Are Impulsive Decisions Always Irrational? An Experimental Investigation of Impulsive Decisions in the Domains of Gains and Losses
Renata M. Heilman,Petko Kusev,Mircea Miclea,Joseph Teal,Rose Martin,Alessia Passanisi,Ugo Pace +6 more
TL;DR: In this article, a cross-sectional experimental study was conducted to investigate some of the possible underlying mechanisms, such as cognitive factors and emotional states, that promote future-oriented decisions and found that people are substantially more impulsive over smaller and sooner monetary losses compared to equivalent gains.