scispace - formally typeset
J

Joseph Wun-Tat Chan

Researcher at King's College London

Publications -  15
Citations -  216

Joseph Wun-Tat Chan is an academic researcher from King's College London. The author has contributed to research in topics: Competitive analysis & Online algorithm. The author has an hindex of 8, co-authored 15 publications receiving 203 citations. Previous affiliations of Joseph Wun-Tat Chan include University of Hong Kong & Hong Kong Baptist University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Optimizing throughput and energy in online deadline scheduling

TL;DR: This article presents the first online algorithm for the more realistic setting where processor speed is bounded and the system may be overloaded; the algorithm is O(1)-competitive on both throughput and energy usage.
Journal ArticleDOI

Dynamic bin packing of unit fractions items

TL;DR: In this article, the competitive ratio of best-fit and worst-fit algorithms was shown to be 3 and 2.4942, respectively, and no on-line algorithm is better than 2.428-competitive.
Journal ArticleDOI

On Dynamic Bin Packing: An Improved Lower Bound and Resource Augmentation Analysis

TL;DR: The main result in this paper is a lower bound of 2.5 on the achievable competitive ratio, improving the best known 2.428 lower bound, and revealing that packing items of restricted form like unit fractions, for which a 2.4985-competitive algorithm is known, is indeed easier.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Online frequency allocation in cellular networks

TL;DR: It is discovered that an interesting phenomenon occurs for the online frequency allocation problem when the number of calls considered becomes large: previously-derived optimal (lower and upper) bounds on competitive ratios no longer hold true.
Book ChapterDOI

Frequency allocation problems for linear cellular networks

TL;DR: This paper considers the online frequency allocation problem for wireless linear (highway) cellular networks, and proposes an optimal online algorithm with both competitive ratio of 5/3, which is better than the Greedy algorithm, with bothcompetitive ratios 2.382.