scispace - formally typeset
J

Julio C. Ribera

Researcher at University of Puerto Rico

Publications -  13
Citations -  2523

Julio C. Ribera is an academic researcher from University of Puerto Rico. The author has contributed to research in topics: Population & Mental health. The author has an hindex of 13, co-authored 13 publications receiving 2454 citations. Previous affiliations of Julio C. Ribera include Veterans Health Administration & United States Department of Veterans Affairs.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Estimates of the prevalence of childhood maladjustment in a community survey in Puerto Rico. The use of combined measures.

TL;DR: A two-stage epidemiologic survey was carried out on a probability sample of the population aged 4 through 16 years in Puerto Rico, and data were provided on the demographic correlates of maladjustment and on the comorbidity of DSM-III diagnostic domains.
Journal ArticleDOI

Further measures of the psychometric properties of the children's global assessment scale

TL;DR: The Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS), a measure of overall severity of disturbance, is an adaptation of the Global assessment Scale for adults that can be of heuristic value to complement other methods of diagnostic categorization.
Journal ArticleDOI

ADHD correlates, comorbidity, and impairment in community and treated samples of children and adolescents.

TL;DR: Although the prevalence rates and degree of impairment differed, the general patterns of correlates, comorbidity and impairment were similar in both populations and the exceptions were associated with conduct disorder, anxiety, impairment in the ADHDComorbid group, and age factors that appeared to be related to selection into treatment.
Journal ArticleDOI

Test-retest reliability of the Spanish version of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC-IV).

TL;DR: Surprisingly, the inclusion of impairment as a criterion for diagnosis did not substantially change the pattern of results for specific disorders, and parents were more reliable when reporting on diagnoses of younger (4–10) than older children.