Showing papers by "Justus J. Randolph published in 2020"

Aberrant left hepatic arteries arising from left gastric arteries and their clinical importance

Abstract: Background The Aberrant Left Hepatic Artery (ALHA) is replaced when it does not originate from the hepatic artery proper and it is the only supply to that part of the liver, while an accessory artery coexists with a normal artery. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the incidence of ALHAs including the one arising from the Left Gastric Artery, also named Hyrtl's artery. Methods A literature search in PubMed, SCOPUS, WOS and Google Scholar was performed. The risk of bias was assessed by means of the AQUA tool. The main outcome was the prevalence of ALHA. Secondary outcomes were the prevalence of the accessory and replaced left hepatic arteries. A subgroup analysis was conducted by geographic region and type of evaluation. Results This review included 57 studies, with a total of 19,284 patients. The majority of the studies involved the use of radiological techniques -especially Angio-CT-and were performed in Asia. The overall risk of bias was moderate. The overall prevalence of the ALHA was 13.52%; the overall prevalence was 8.26% for the Replaced ALHA and 5.55% for the Accessory ALHA. In the 18 studies that employed Michels' classification, Type II had the lowest prevalence (0.36%) and Type VII the highest prevalence (6.62%). Discussion Some of the studies included did not distinguish between the ‘‘replaced’’ and ‘‘accessory’’ ALHA (34.25%). Some surgical dissection techniques proved insufficient for the localization of other hepatic arteries. These results suggest that an accurate preoperative radiological evaluation is needed to localize replaced arteries.

Systematic review and meta‐analysis of the anatomical variants of the left colic artery

Abstract: Aim To provide a comprehensive evidence-based assessment of the anatomical variations of the left colic artery (LCA). Method A thorough systematic search of the literature up until 1 April 2019 was conducted on the electronic databases PubMed, SCOPUS and Web of Science (WOS) to identify studies eligible for inclusion. Data were extracted and pooled into a meta-analysis using the Metafor package in R. The primary outcomes of interest were the absence of the LCA and the anatomical variants of its origin. The secondary outcomes were the distance (mean ± SD) between the origin of the inferior mesenteric artery (OIMA) and the origin of the left colic artery (OLCA). Results A total of 19 studies (n = 2040 patients) were included. The pooled prevalence estimate (PPE) of LCA absence was 1.2% (95% CI 0.0-3.6%). Across participants with either a Type I or Type II LCA, the PPE of a Type I LCA was 49.0% (95% CI 40.2-57.8%). The PPE of a Type II LCA was therefore 51.0%. The pooled mean distance from the OIMA to the OLCA was 40.41 mm (95 CI% 38.69-42.12 mm). The pooled mean length of a Type I LCA was 39.12 mm (95% CI 36.70-41.53 mm) while the pooled mean length of a Type IIa and Type IIb LCA was 41.43 mm (95% CI 36.90-43.27 mm) and 39.64 mm (95% CI 37.68-41.59 mm), respectively. Conclusion Although the absence of the LCA is a rare occurrence (PPE 1.2%), it may be associated with an important risk of anastomotic leakage as a result of insufficient vascularization of the proximal colonic conduit. It is also necessary to distinguish variants I and II of Latarjet, the frequency of which is identical, with division of the LCA being technically more straightforward in variant I of Latarjet. Surgeons should be aware that technical difficulties are likely to be more common with variant II of Latarjet, as LCA ligation may be more difficult due to its close proximity to the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV).

The tip of the iceberg of colorectal perforation from enema: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abstract: Although rare, perforation following an enema used to treat constipation is a dangerous complication. However, no recommendations or guidelines for enema use are available. So, in common clinical practice, the diagnostic approach and the treatment are not standardized. In an attempt to resolve this clinical dilemma associated with high mortality and potential medicolegal claims for malpractice, we have performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting on colorectal perforation secondary to enema use for adult patients with constipation. A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus was performed according to the PRISMA statement up until February 2020. Studies that reported on colorectal perforation from enema use in adult patients with constipation were included. The primary outcomes were the rate of hospital mortality and pooled prevalence estimates of mortality from perforation secondary to enema use. The secondary outcomes were the administration of rectal enemas, site of visceral perforation, signs, symptoms, radiological evaluation, and type of treatment A total of 15 studies were included in the final analysis (49 patients). Across all studies, the pooled prevalence estimate of mortality for patients with perforation secondary to enema use was 38.5%, (95% CI [22.7%, 55.5%]). This rate was lower in patients who had surgery (35%) than in patients treated conservatively (57.1%). The sites of perforation were intraoperatively reported in 84% of cases, but in 16% of patients the rectal perforation was undiagnosed, and surgical decision making was problematic. The primary location of the perforation was the rectum in 80.9% of the patients. The enema was administered by a nurse in 90% of the cases, self-administered in 7.5% and a family doctor in 2.5%. The main objective of emergency surgery in this setting is resection of the perforation caused by the enema; when it is not possible to resect the perforated rectum, faecal diversion is needed. Hartmann’s procedure was most commonly performed by the surgeons in this review (60.7%), with other reported treatments included a diverting proximal loop colostomy and sigmoid segment exteriorization Considering the studies available, it is not possible to undertake a thorough evaluation of enema use, including the associated complications and their management. Further data are required to allow the development of guidelines to advice on safe enema use and management of complications.

Preliminary Development and Validation of the School Connectedness Questionnaire

Abstract: School connectedness is the extent to which a student feels that adults and peers on their school campus care about their overall wellbeing. Students who exhibit high levels of school connectedness are at a reduced risk to engage in health-risk behavior, however students with and without disabilities may experience difficulty with developing high levels of school connectedness. Because of the importance of understanding levels of school connectedness, a scale was developed to measure levels of school connectedness for students in special education and general education in elementary, middle, and high school environments. The scale was developed by administering an initial set of 24 items from a researcher-created 40-item pool to 68 students with emotional and behavior disorders in special education and 132 students in general education. A principal components analysis was then conducted on those data; 10 items were chosen for a final set. The School Connectedness Questionnaire has been shown to exhibit high internal structure validity and moderate internal consistency reliability for both populations.