Effective assessment of treatment outcome and the development of successful rehabilitation for head and neck cancer patients demand an evaluation of the relevant parameters of functional status. This paper reports the development and testing of a new Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer Patients designed to assess the unique areas of dysfunction experienced by this population. The instrument is a simple, practical, clinician-rated assessment tool consisting of three subscales: (1) Understandability of Speech, (2) Normalcy of Diet, and (3) Eating in Public. The scale was administered to a group of 181 head and neck patients and a comparison group of 30 breast cancer patients. Results indicate that the scale is reliable across raters and sensitive to functional differences across a broad spectrum of head and neck cancer.

A performance status scale for head and neck cancer patients.

A head and neck cancer specific questionnaire module designed to be used in quality of life assessments before, during, and after radiotherapy and surgery, with or without combinations with chemotherapy has been developed in accordance with guidelines given by the EORTC Quality of Life Study Group. Relevant issues were generated by means of literature search, and interviews with specialists and patients. Pre-testing of a preliminary questionnaire module was performed in patients from Norway, Sweden, Denmark, United Kingdom and French-speaking Belgium. The resulting head and neck cancer module, the EORTC QLQ-H&N37, includes 37 items concerning disease and treatment related symptoms, social function and sexuality. By using a combination of the general EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ-H&N37, health-related quality of life measurements may be compared between studies in different cancer populations, and still be sensitive to changes in the target population.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.3109/02841869409098450

Development of a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire module to be used in quality of life assessments in head and neck cancer patients. EORTC Quality of Life Study Group.

To examine the health-related quality of life (HRQL) in long-term head and neck (H&N) cancer survivors compared with general population norms. HRQL was assessed with three standardized questionnaires: the SF-36 Health Survey (Short Form 36) and the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35 (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, -Core 30 and -Head and Neck 35 cancer module). Altogether 135 H&N cancer patients (mean age 62 years, 31% females) of 151 survivors (89% acceptance) from a longitudinal HRQL study (n = 232) were included 3 years after diagnosis. The H&N cancer patients' SF-36 scores did not differ significantly from those of an age- and sex-matched sample (n = 871) from the Swedish normative population, except on the role-physical functioning scale. On the other hand, treatment-related side-effects and disease-specific problems (e.g., swallowing, local pain and dry mouth) measured by the H&N cancer module were, with few exceptions, significantly worse than norm values. Gender comparisons revealed that female H&N cancer patients generally scored better than the norms on both the SF-36 and the EORTC QLQ-C30, while the male patients scored significantly worse on most SF-36 scales. Patients > or =65 years more often scored worse than the norm than did patients <65. Clinically relevant differences were found on the majority of SF-36 scales in comparison of tumour sites, however, comparisons of patients with small (stage I+II) versus advanced (stage III+IV) tumours revealed few differences. Three years after diagnosis H&N cancer patients still suffer significant functional limitations/problems related to their disease and its treatment but these problems do not generally affect their overall HRQL. Tumour stage no longer differentiates HRQL at 3 years, however, factors related to the patients' age, gender and location of the tumour appear to have bearing on their reported health status.

/pdf/health-related-quality-of-life-in-long-term-head-and-neck-20kgxr6v9t.pdf

Health-related quality of life in long-term head and neck cancer survivors: a comparison with general population norms.

Background

Multiple oral complaints occur following radiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer, but the frequency and severity of symptoms of dysfunction and discomfort are not well understood. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the quality of life, oral function, and oral symptoms following radiotherapy.



Methods

A general quality of life survey (the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] Quality of Life Questionnaire QLQ-C30), with an added oral symptom and function scale was mailed to 100 patients more than 6 months following radiotherapy.



Results

Sixty-five patients responded. Difficulty chewing or eating was reported by 43% of respondents. Dry mouth was reported by 91.8%, change in taste by 75.4%, dysphagia by 63.1%, altered speech by 50.8%, difficulty with dentures by 48.5%, and increased tooth decay by 38.5% of dentate patients. Pain was common (58.4%) and interfered with daily activities in 30.8%. Mood complaints were reported by approximately half the patients. Interference of the physical condition social activities was reported by 60%. The frequency of oral side effects correlated with radiation treatment fields and dose.



Conclusion

Oral complications following radiotherapy for head and neck cancer are common and affect quality of life. Use of a general function scale such as the EORTC questionnaire with the addition of disease/site specific scales may provide useful data on outcome of therapy and upon the complications associated with therapy and impact upon the quality of life. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Head Neck 21: 1–11, 1999.

Quality of life and oral function following radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND

High levels of distress are a concern regarding patients with head and neck cancer. Early detection of and intervention for such distress are needed to predict patients' adaptation to treatment or rehabilitation, but few studies have investigated the detection of their distress in a patient population of significant size.



METHODS

The authors examined 107 consecutive patients with head and neck cancer to assess their psychologic distress (adjustment disorders or major depression) or other psychiatric problems by structured psychiatric interview before the initial cancer treatment. They also evaluated predictive factors for psychologic distress and assessed the ability of a self-rating questionnaire (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS) to screen for distress.



RESULTS

Of 107 subjects, 18 (16.8%) had an adjustment disorder or major depression. Thirty-six (33.6%), 7 (6.5%), and 35 (32.7%) met criteria for alcohol dependence, alcohol abuse, and nicotine dependence, respectively. Logistic regression analysis revealed that having advanced stage cancer (odds ratio, 5.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41–39.7; P = 0.03) and living alone (odds ratio, 4.83; 95% CI, 1.04–22.2; P = 0.04) were significantly associated with having psychologic distress. The optimal cutoff point for the HADS screening for psychologic distress was 15. This cutoff point gave 72.2% sensitivity and 81.4% specificity.



CONCLUSIONS

Head and neck cancer patients who have advanced disease or live alone should be assessed so that psychologic distress can be detected and intervention made. HADS is a useful clinical instrument to screen for their distress. Cancer 2000;88:2817–23. © 2000 American Cancer Society.

Prevalence, predictive factors, and screening for psychologic distress in patients with newly diagnosed head and neck cancer.

This study is a systematic analysis of the literature on psychosocial aspects in head and neck cancer patients. Patients with head and neck cancer experience a variety of physical as well as psychosocial problems. Physical problems include swallowing or chewing, speech and physical appearance. Psychosocial problems include anxiety, depression, loss of self-esteem and uncertainty about the future. Because of these problems, isolation from friends typically occurs, re-employment is difficult, and there are social and sexual tensions within families. Information and support by professionals, partners and/or fellow patients are related to positive rehabilitation outcomes such as the acquisition of speech, increases in constructive social functioning and decreases in depression.

Psychosocial aspects of head and neck cancer–a review of the literature

In recent years, mutual support by cancer patients has spread rapidly. The most important characteristic of the mutual support groups is that support is given in a face-to-face contact between a volunteer and a new patient; the support is based on an exchange of their experiences.

K. de Meij

Papers

Psychosocial aspects of head and neck cancer–a review of the literature

Help Given by Fellow Patients