scispace - formally typeset
K

Karl Gustafsson

Researcher at Stockholm University

Publications -  31
Citations -  603

Karl Gustafsson is an academic researcher from Stockholm University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Politics & China. The author has an hindex of 13, co-authored 27 publications receiving 429 citations. Previous affiliations of Karl Gustafsson include Swedish Institute of International Affairs & Lund University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Routinised recognition and anxiety: Understanding the deterioration in Sino-Japanese relations

TL;DR: In this paper, a case study of the deterioration in Sino-Japanese relations in the twenty-first century, which took place despite the existence of several factors that might be thought likely to have led to an improvement, is presented.
Book

Narratives and Bilateral Relations : Rethinking the "History Issue" in Sino-Japanese Relations

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a framework that makes possible an understanding of bilateral relations that challenges mainstream International Relations (IR) approaches through a challenge to the traditional IR approach through a...
Journal ArticleDOI

Is China's Discursive Power Increasing? The "Power of the Past" in Sino-Japanese Relations

Karl Gustafsson
- 05 Aug 2014 - 
TL;DR: The authors analyzes the use of discourses about the past on three levels, domestic, bilateral, and international, and concludes that despite China's increased material capabilities, the Chinese government's discursive power has actually decreased.
Journal ArticleDOI

Japan's Pacifism Is Dead

TL;DR: In the security field, Japan can now do more or less everything that other, more ‘normal’ countries do in the security domain this article, which is a huge improvement.
Journal ArticleDOI

Long live pacifism! Narrative power and Japan’s pacifist model

TL;DR: In this paper, international relations research acknowledges that states can have different security policies and neglects the fact that models may exist in the security policy realm, but neglects to consider the role of models in these policies.